<h3>Student and young researcher travel grants</h3>The RAFA 2026 Conference Organizing Committee is pleased to announce the offer for 5 travel grants to PhD students and early stage researchers (age limit 35 years) to attend the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/events/928">12th International Symposium on Recent Advances in Food Analysis (RAFA 2026)</a>.High scientific quality of the contribution submitted either for poster and / or oral/young scientists´ oral presentation will be considered for evaluation.For the successful applicants registration fee will be waived and travel and accommodation costs will be reimbursed up to the amount of € 400 upon submission of a travel and accommodation expense claim after the conference.<h5>🎓 Young scientists at RAFA 2026 will benefit from:</h5><ul><li>Dedicated slots for oral presentations within the main scientific programme</li><li>Competitive travel grants for young scientists</li><li>Award(s) for the best poster presentations</li></ul>Whether you are a PhD student or an early-career researcher, RAFA 2026 offers a unique opportunity to present your work, gain international exposure and connect with leading experts in the field.<blockquote>Call for RAFA 2026 travel grants is OPEN!👉<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.rafa2026.eu/draft/rafa2026_travel_grant_form.html">Submit your application here</a><ul><li>Deadline for submission of an application is May 31, 2026.</li><li>Notification of applications´ evaluation will be available on June 23, 2026.</li></ul></blockquote><h3>Registration</h3><blockquote>👉<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://rafa.easyevent.eu/tickets/">Registration for RAFA 2026 is OPEN!</a>Early-bird registration until 30 June, 2026</blockquote>After successful submission of your registration, you will receive by e-mail (i) an automatic confirmation of receipt indicating the total amount of payment due (either for bank transfer or for on-line payment by card), (ii) login to Member section where you can administrate your profile, submit your abstracts, and from September 2026 register for satellite events, workshops and seminars. If it will not be delivered within a few minutes after submission of your registration please contact us at RAFA2026@vscht.cz.<h3>Abstract submission</h3><blockquote>👉<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://rafa.easyevent.eu/tickets/">CALL for ABSTRACTS is OPEN!</a>In order to submit an abstract, you must first register to attend RAFA 2026. After registration you will receive an access to the Member section where you can submit your abstract(s).</blockquote>

Deadline for the RAFA 2026 Young Researcher Travel Grant is approaching

🎤 Presenter: Barbara Grace Saunders (William &amp; Mary, Williamsburg, USA)💾 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/paper/32782">PDF presentation</a><h3>Abstract</h3>Gunshot residue (GSR) is expelled as a "plume" of vaporized material during a firearm discharge event. As it disperses, condenses, and settles on surfaces in vicinity of the discharge, it creates chemical depositions that provide essential information for forensic casework involving criminal firearm usage.GSR contains organic (OGSR) and inorganic (IGSR) components, both of which may carry evidentiary value. Traditional analyses involve the targeted point analysis of IGSR via scanning electron microscopy - energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?search=SEM-EDS">SEM-EDS</a>), and conclusions are drawn based on a well-established elemental and morphological profile "characteristic" to IGSR. This method has lost impact as a standard for forensic analysis due to increased use of "green" - heavy metal-free - ammunition, which omits the lead, barium, and antimony that are traditionally seen as the "characteristic" markers of GSR.This study aimed to develop a holistic approach to the analysis of GSR using both SEM-EDS as a targeted approach to IGSR analysis and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography – time-of-flight mass spectrometry (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?instrumentationItems=2-3-13">GC×GC-TOFMS</a>) as a nontargeted approach to OGSR analysis. GSR samples were collected from the hands of shooters at a police firearms recertification training using the tape lift method. SEM-EDS was used to identify IGSR and develop new morphological and elemental profiles for heavy metal-free residues. OGSR components have been positively identified through sample analysis via liquid extraction, chromatographic separation via GC×GC-TOFMS, and data processing.Future work on this project will include the optimization of data processing methods and the development of SPME as an alternative sample extraction method.<h3>Video Transcription</h3>The transition toward environmentally friendly “green” ammunition is creating new challenges for forensic laboratories. Traditional gunshot residue (GSR) analysis relies heavily on the detection of heavy-metal-containing particles produced during firearm discharge. However, modern ammunition formulations increasingly eliminate these metals, making conventional forensic protocols less effective.This study presents the development of a combined analytical strategy for the characterization of green gunshot residue (GSR) by integrating:<ul><li>Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) for inorganic GSR (IGSR)</li><li>Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography coupled to Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) for organic GSR (OGSR)</li></ul>The ultimate goal is to provide forensic laboratories with a more complete and defensible analytical approach for firearm discharge investigations.<h4>Why Green Gunshot Residue Is a Challenge</h4>Gunshot residue consists of particulate matter expelled from firearms during discharge. Rapid increases in temperature and pressure vaporize materials originating from:<ul><li>primer compositions</li><li>bullets</li><li>cartridge cases</li><li>firearm components</li></ul>These materials rapidly condense and deposit on:<ul><li>hands</li><li>skin</li><li>hair</li><li>clothing</li><li>nearby surfaces</li></ul>Because GSR is directly associated with firearm discharge events, it remains an important source of forensic evidence.Historically, forensic scientists have identified GSR using SEM-EDS, focusing on particles containing characteristic heavy metals.However, ammunition manufacturers have increasingly removed heavy metals from primers due to health and environmental concerns. Modern green ammunition replaces traditional metallic components with more environmentally common elements, making classical identification criteria less reliable.<h4>Project Objectives</h4>The project was designed around three primary goals:<ol><li>Redevelop inorganic GSR classification criteria for green ammunition.</li><li>Develop a robust GC×GC-TOFMS workflow for organic GSR analysis.</li><li>Combine both approaches into a comprehensive forensic methodology suitable for future laboratory implementation.</li></ol><h4>Collection of Green GSR Samples</h4>Samples were collected using standard forensic SEM-compatible collection kits.Each kit consisted of:<ul><li>an airtight glass vial</li><li>an aluminum SEM pin stub</li><li>black carbon adhesive for particle collection</li></ul>Sampling was performed by repeatedly dabbing the adhesive surface across:<ul><li>palms</li><li>backs of hands</li><li>forearms</li></ul>of volunteers.To ensure authentic green GSR samples, collection took place during police firearms recertification training at a local firing range. All ammunition used was verified as green ammunition.<h4>Redevelopment of Green IGSR Characterization by SEM-EDS</h4>The first phase focused on updating SEM-EDS criteria for green ammunition residues.Analysis of numerous samples revealed morphological and elemental characteristics that differed from traditional heavy-metal-containing GSR particles.One notable observation was that many candidate particles exhibited a characteristic “sparkling” appearance against the SEM background. These particles often contained elevated metallic content, although not necessarily heavy metals.The resulting profiles provided a more reliable framework for identifying inorganic components of green GSR.Nevertheless, the approach still involved a degree of analyst judgment, motivating the development of a more objective complementary analytical strategy based on organic residue analysis.<h4>Why GC×GC-TOFMS Was Selected</h4>The second phase focused on characterization of organic gunshot residue (OGSR).Compared with conventional one-dimensional GC, GC×GC offers:<ul><li>increased chromatographic peak capacity</li><li>enhanced separation power</li><li>improved resolution of structurally similar compounds</li><li>better discrimination of constitutional isomers</li></ul>These advantages are particularly valuable for forensic samples, where highly complex mixtures often contain numerous nitroaromatic compounds and energetic materials.The instrumentation used was a:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/37">LECO Pegasus BT GC×GC-TOFMS</a></li></ul>which combines comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection.<h4>Development of the Organic GSR Extraction Method</h4>Organic residues were extracted using a liquid extraction procedure adapted from OSAC recommendations for GC-MS analysis.The workflow included:<ol><li>Extraction in methanol</li><li>Evaporation to dryness under nitrogen</li><li>Reconstitution</li><li>Transfer into GC×GC-compatible vials</li></ol>Additional vortexing and sonication steps were incorporated to maximize analyte recovery.<h4>Comparison of Extraction Procedures</h4>The newly developed in-house method was compared with a literature-based extraction protocol.The results demonstrated that the in-house procedure:<ul><li>recovered more analytes</li><li>produced higher peak intensities</li><li>generated a larger average number of chromatographic peaks</li></ul>Important target compounds such as:<ul><li>diphenylamine</li><li>skin matrix compounds</li><li>nitroaromatic species</li></ul>were detected at significantly higher abundance levels.Consequently, the in-house extraction method was selected for all subsequent experiments.<h4>Optimization of the GC×GC Method</h4><h5>Carrier Gas Selection</h5>Initial experiments compared helium and hydrogen carrier gases.Hydrogen provided:<ul><li>improved chromatographic expansion</li><li>better compound visibility</li><li>enhanced separation</li></ul>Therefore, hydrogen was selected for the final method.<h5>Inlet Temperature Optimization</h5>Two inlet temperatures were evaluated:<ul><li>170 °C</li><li>200 °C</li></ul>Although the lower temperature generated a larger number of detected analytes overall, critical GSR target compounds such as:<ul><li>nitroglycerin (ethylene glycol dinitrate)</li><li>diphenylamine</li></ul>showed lower responses or were not detected.As a result, 200 °C was selected as the optimal inlet temperature.<h5>Modulation Period Optimization</h5>Three modulation periods were compared: 2.0 s / 2.5 s / 3.0 s<ul><li>Two-Second Modulation: Produced wraparound effects where analytes could not fully elute within a modulation cycle.</li><li>Three-Second Modulation: Created excessive unused chromatographic space and compressed analyte distributions.</li><li>Two-and-a-Half-Second Modulation: Provided the best balance between resolution and chromatographic efficiency.</li></ul>Therefore, 2.5 seconds was selected as the final modulation period.<h4>Validation Using Analytical Standards</h4>The optimized GC×GC method was validated using several reference standards.<h5>Seven-Component Phthalate Standard</h5>All seven analytes were successfully identified.The compounds exhibited:<ul><li>excellent chromatographic resolution</li><li>reproducible retention behavior</li><li>clear separation across both chromatographic dimensions</li></ul>These retention regions subsequently helped identify corresponding compounds in authentic GSR samples.<h5>Twelve-Component Nitroaromatic Standard</h5>All twelve analytes were successfully identified.Particularly important was the clear separation of compounds such as:<ul><li>TNT</li><li>DNT</li><li>nitrotoluenes</li></ul>which frequently appear in explosive and propellant formulations.This experiment demonstrated the superior resolving power of GC×GC compared with conventional one-dimensional GC.<h5>Nitroglycerin Standard</h5>Nitroglycerin was successfully detected and its retention coordinates established.These retention characteristics will serve as reference markers for future identification in authentic GSR samples.<h5>Gun Surveillance Standard</h5>The final validation mixture contained nine known compounds.Seven components were successfully identified.Two unexpected compounds:<ul><li>phenazine</li><li>benzothiazole</li></ul>appeared in the chromatograms, while one expected analyte overlapped with column bleed.Although further refinement is required, the preliminary results demonstrated promising analytical performance.<h4>Major Outcomes of the Study</h4>The project has already produced several significant achievements:<h5>Inorganic GSR Analysis</h5><ul><li>Redesigned SEM-EDS classification profiles for green ammunition residues</li><li>Improved characterization of heavy-metal-free particles</li></ul><h5>Organic GSR Analysis</h5><ul><li>Optimized methanol-based extraction procedure</li><li>Fully developed GC×GC-TOFMS analytical workflow</li><li>Improved detection of key OGSR markers</li><li>Verified retention behavior of multiple relevant analytes</li></ul><h5>Integrated Forensic Strategy</h5><ul><li>Combined IGSR and OGSR characterization</li><li>Enhanced confidence in green GSR identification</li><li>Improved potential for courtroom-defensible evidence interpretation</li></ul><h4>Future Work</h4>Although the method successfully distinguishes the presence or absence of green GSR, additional validation remains necessary before routine forensic implementation.Future investigations will focus on:<ul><li>comparison of sorbent-based extraction approaches with methanol extraction</li><li>acquisition of retention indices for stronger compound confirmation</li><li>further validation of target analyte identities</li><li>increased method robustness for forensic casework</li></ul>The ultimate objective is to establish a validated methodology suitable for routine forensic laboratory deployment in the era of green ammunition.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study demonstrates that combining SEM-EDS and GC×GC-TOFMS provides a promising framework for the forensic analysis of modern green gunshot residue. By integrating inorganic and organic residue characterization, forensic scientists can generate a more comprehensive evidential profile of firearm discharge events. The optimized extraction protocol, chromatographic conditions, and preliminary validation results show strong potential for future implementation in forensic laboratories, helping maintain the evidential value of GSR as ammunition technologies continue to evolve.<blockquote>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</blockquote>

Developing a Combined Approach to Green Gunshot Residue Analysis in the Forensic Laboratory (Barbara Grace Saunders, MDCW 2026)

Our Library never stops expanding. What are the most recent contributions to LabRulezICPMS Library in the week of 25th May 2026? Check out new documents from the field of spectroscopy/spectrometry and related techniques!<blockquote>👉 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library">SEARCH THE LARGEST REPOSITORY OF DOCUMENTS ABOUT SPECTROSCOPY/SPECTROMETRY RELATED TECHNIQUES</a></blockquote><blockquote>👉 Need info about different analytical techniques? Peek into <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezLCMS</a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezGCMS</a> libraries.</blockquote>This week we bring you application notes by Agilent Technologies, Shimadzu &nbsp;and Thermo Fisher Scientific!<h3>1. Agilent Technologies: Analysis of Soil and Sediments by ICP-MS with Advanced Sample Introduction Tools</h3>Simplified sample preparation enabled by the Agilent Mira Mist Nebulizer and an In-Line Particle Filter<ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_enviro_soil_sample_prep_9500_icp_qqq_5994_9126en_agilent_8299f007e9.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul>ICP-MS is widely employed for monitoring inorganic elements in soil and sediments, with established methods such as US EPA 6020B providing a validated framework for the accurate, multi‑element analysis of environmental samples.1 In a separate study, we demonstrated the outstanding performance capabilities of the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=9500">Agilent 9500 Triple Quadrupole ICP-MS</a> (ICP-QQQ) in compliance with EPA 6020B requirements.2 The instrument, which includes the Ultra High Matrix Introduction (UHMI) system for enhanced plasma stability and robustness, employed Advanced Helium Mode (AHM) and Air cell mode to achieve lower limits of detection (LODs) compared to conventional cell gas approaches.3,4The two collision/reaction cell (CRC) modes of operation were enabled by the Agilent Dual-Cell System (DCS) —a unique CRC that provides the following performance advantages when operated in AHM and Air cell mode: – AHM – This innovative He-based gas collision-cell mode significantly enhances sensitivity for low-mass analytes while providing robust interference removal across the entire mass range. – This single gas mode eliminates the need for multiple modes, replacing no gas, conventional He, and high energy (HE) He mode. – Air cell mode – Using oxygen (O2 ) from air and an integrated air filter for the 9500 ICP-QQQ, Air cell mode leverages reactions between O2 and analytes to improve detection limits (DLs) for oxygen-reactive species. – Air cell mode effectively eliminates interferences, including M++ that are challenging to resolve using He-based gas methods.5 – With an unlimited supply of O2 in air, Air cell mode eliminates the need for O2 gas cylinders, reducing operating costs and simplifying workflows.Of all the ICP-MS nebulizers, the Agilent Mira Mist nebulizer offers the best resistance to concentrated acids and organic solvents. Its parallel path design ensures good tolerance to high levels of particulates and total dissolved solids (TDS), providing excellent resistance to clogging. In this study, the 9500 ICP-QQQ equipped with an in-line particle filter and Mira Mist nebulizer was used to determine trace and major elements in five environmental certified reference materials (CRMs) and a real sediment sample. The performance of the method was evaluated according to criteria set out in EPA Method 6020B.<h4>Experimental&nbsp;</h4><h5>Instrumentation&nbsp;</h5>All measurements were performed using an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=9500">Agilent 9500 ICP-QQQ</a> that includes the following standard components: nickel (Ni) interface cones and newly designed DCS cell. The design features and functionality of the 9500 and DCS are explained elsewhere.3,4 The 9500 was also equipped with the optional Agilent Advanced Valve System (AVS&nbsp;MS) discrete sampling system for improved productivity. The AVS&nbsp;MS system’s high-speed piston pump works seamlessly with the Agilent SPS 4 and SPS&nbsp;6 autosamplers for sample delivery, ensuring the high sample throughput necessary to meet the operational needs of most environmental testing laboratories.To optimize signal stability with the Mira Mist nebulizer, the nebulizer pump speed was adjusted and a makeup gas was introduced (Table 1). In the 9500 ICP-QQQ, both the makeup gas and dilution gas can be added, enabling finer control of the plasma gas flow rates to optimize signal %RSD within the target sensitivity zone. The lens parameters were set automatically using the Autotune function in the software. The in-line filter’s internal volume is sufficiently small that its presence does not influence AVS MS sample introduction timing or method parameters. As a result, the same settings were used with and without the filter installed (Table 2).<h4>Conclusion&nbsp;</h4>In this study, sediment samples were analyzed in accordance with EPA Method 6020B using the Agilent 9500 ICP‑QQQ with UHMI and the optional AVS MS. The system was equipped with advanced sample introduction components, including the Mira Mist nebulizer and an in‑line particle filter.&nbsp;The combination of the Mira Mist nebulizer and in-line filter enabled the analysis of sediment digests without a dedicated filtration step, reducing sample preparation time and consumable costs. At the same time, the configuration minimized the risk of sample introduction blockages, supporting robust and reliable long-term ICP-QQQ operation for complex environmental matrices.Overall, the 9500 ICP-QQQ with the Mira Mist nebulizer and the in-line particle filter achieved excellent analytical data:&nbsp;<ul><li>Low detection limits in the low ng/L (ppt) range for most analytes&nbsp;</li><li>The same or similar washout efficiency of sticky elements as a standard sample introduction configuration&nbsp;</li><li>The same sample introduction timing, regardless of whether the filter was installed or not&nbsp;</li><li>Method robustness and reproducibility over more than eight hours of continuous measurements, as demonstrated by the recoveries of ISTDs and CCVs within the limits specified in EPA Method 6020B&nbsp;</li><li>Recoveries of all certified elements in the five environmental CRMs, matrix spike sample, and spiked real sediment sample within ±10%, confirming the effective control of interferences using AHM and Air cell mode&nbsp;</li></ul>The study has highlighted how the 9500 ICP-QQQ with the Mira Mist nebulizer and in‑line particle filter enhances sample preparation efficiency and analytical performance for the analysis of complex sediment digests.<h3>2. Shimadzu: Analysis of Inorganic Elements in Urine Using EDXRF</h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_01_01007_en_c3bd71bbb3.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul><h4>User Benefits</h4><ul><li>Inorganic elements in urine can be quantified at the ppm level without any complicated sample pretreatment.</li><li>Qual-quantitative analysis is possible using the FP (Fundamental Parameter) method, which does not require standards.</li><li>Qual-quantitative results are obtained within 10 minutes per sample.</li></ul>Inorganic element poisoning, including heavy metals, is caused by accidents or criminal incidents, and the causative elements are diverse. Although some of these elements are highly toxic, there are cases in which it is difficult to distinguish them at an early stage because they lack specific symptoms of poisoning. Therefore, analytical methods for rapid screening of these elements are required in forensic research.&nbsp;Inorganic elements are generally analyzed by ICP-AES or ICP-MS. Although these techniques allow trace-level quantitation, they require chemical pretreatment such as dilution and deproteinization, and the samples are limited to liquid specimens. In contrast, energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (EDXRF - <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=EDX-7200">EDX-7200</a>) offers sufficient sensitivity in the concentration range associated with poisoning and enables simple, non-destructive analysis in a short time.&nbsp;This application describesthe results of quantitative analysis of 15 elements in urine by the calibration curve method, and qualquantitative analysis by the FP (Fundamental Parameter) method based on sensitivity coefficients installed in the instrument. The errors in the quantitative values obtained by the FP-based qualquantitative analysis method were approximately ±20 %, indicating that sufficient quantitative accuracy was achieved. Screening can be performed within 10 minutes persample.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The FP method demonstrated high accuracy for quantitation without calibration curves. Furthermore, urine samples do not require complicated pretreatment such as protein removal, and the analysis time is as short as approximately 10 minutes per sample. This method is well suited for poisoning screening in forensic research.<h3>3. Thermo Fisher Scientific: Analysis of copper alloys with the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1978">ARL X900 XRF Spectrometer</a></h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/analysis_of_copper_alloys_arl_9900_an41427_203b52e126.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul><h4>Copper alloys&nbsp;</h4>are very important products because they are used for many applications and many manufacturing processes as described in the next few paragraphs. It is important to accurately analyze these materials to confirm compliance of their chemical specifications that imply physical properties, like conductivity, compressive strength, hardness, resistance to traction and to abrasion. High product quality and efficient production can be ensured with accurate analysis results. Copper alloys Pure copper is mixed with other elements to produce a wide range of alloys: Brasses (Cu-Zn), bronzes (Cu-Sn), gun metal (Cu-Sn-Zn) used for casting due to its excellent fluidity, for valves, taps and water fittings. Manganese bronzes (Cu-Zn-Mn) are not true bronzes as Sn is not the essential constituent. Used for rudders, propellers, and ship fittings. Cupro-nickel (Cu-Ni) used for coins, tubes, wires, electrical resistances, and thermocouples. Nickel silver (Cu-Ni-Zn) used for marine applications, car radiators and fittings.&nbsp;<h4>Brass&nbsp;</h4>One of the most important non-ferrous engineering alloys. It covers a large range of physical properties with multiple applications. Copper can hold about 39% of zinc in solid solution. Alloys containing less than 39% Zn are known as α-brasses. This brass (70/30) is very widely employed for cartridge, cases, condenser tubes, etc. From 39% to 46% of Zn, a β-solid solution gives αβ-brass. This alloy (60/40) is found in extensive engineering applications with enhanced corrosion resistance used in marine applications. Alloys containing more than 49% Zn are very hard and only used for brazing brasses.<h4>Instrument parameters and conditions&nbsp;</h4>The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/1978">ARL X900 XRF Spectrometer</a> can accommodate up to 24 fixed monochromator channels alongside the goniometer or up to 32 fixed monochromator channels when no goniometer is fitted. New high counting fixed channel monochromators using an SCX detector are available to further improve the precision of analysis, especially for elements like Cu, Zn and Ni.Our unique proprietary Moiré fringe goniometer ensures speed, flexibility and reliability of analysis thanks to the clever frictionfree positioning system. Up to nine crystals and four collimators can be fitted. With the two detectors (flow proportional and scintillation counters), precise elemental analysis from Boron to Californium is possible.&nbsp;The ARL X900 XRF spectrometer can be calibrated using commercially available certified reference materials (CRM) or well analyzed samples from the user. Calibrations can be delivered from the factory, hence reducing the commissioning time at the customer’s site.&nbsp;It should be stressed that an XRF spectrometer is a very accurate comparator, but the accuracy of the final analysis is entirely dependent on the quality of the standards used for calibration and on the care and reproducibility of sample preparation which must be identical for CRMs and for routine samples as well.This application note only includes data obtained mostly on fixed channels and on some goniometer channels. For more results using goniometer channels please refer to AN41426.<h4>Conclusion&nbsp;</h4>Analysis of all sorts of copper alloys can be performed with ease using the ARL X900 Simultaneous-Sequential XRF Spectrometer. The performance of the Moiré fringe goniometer is such that it can be used for analysis of any elements that are not fitted as fixed channels. The analysis on the goniometer is done while the fixed channels are measuring. In addition, it can be used as a backup in case of failure of any of the fixed channels.&nbsp;Appropriate calibrations for copper alloys can be delivered turnkey from the Thermo Fisher Scientific factory. In this case the commissioning time of the spectrometer is reduced to a minimum.&nbsp;The precision is excellent in these matrix types for routine or R&amp;D analysis, especially when the new high counting fixed channel monochromator is used for elements like Cu, Zn, and Ni.&nbsp;Furthermore, operation is made easy through the innovative <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/2029">Thermo Scientific™ OXSAS™ Software</a> that operates with the latest Microsoft Windows® package.&nbsp;Thermo Fisher Scientific’s long experience in metals analysis comes from an installed base of over 2,000 XRF spectrometers worldwide. The ARL X900 spectrometer is the answer to your metallurgical analysis needs, whether they involve incoming material control, metal QC, or production analysis. Working 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, the ARL X900 spectrometer delivers dependable performance year after year. The high performance of the ARL X900 XRF Spectrometer will meet your analytical needs today and in the future

News from LabRulezICPMS Library - Week 22, 2026

Article

Events

Application

Video

Presentation

RAFA provides an overview of contemporary trends in ANALYTICAL & BIOANALYTICAL STRATEGIES IN FOOD QUALITY AND SAFETY CONTROL and discusses CHALLENGES / NOVEL APPROACHES IN FOOD AND NATURAL PRODUCTS ANALYSIS.

Recent Advances in Food Analysis (RAFA)

The Multidimensional Chromatography (MDC) Workshop draws experts in this exciting field to share and discuss their research.

The Multidimensional Chromatography Workshop

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

SPECTRO Analytical Instruments

This on-demand webinar presents an in-depth analysis of vanadium electrolytes using <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.spectro.com/icp-oes-principle">ICP-OES</a>&nbsp;and <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.spectro.com/xrf-principle">ED-XRF</a>&nbsp;technology. The analysis is essential for the optimization and quality control of vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs), which are recognized for their scalability, long lifespan, and high energy storage capacity. As VRFBs are increasingly integrated into renewable energy systems, ensuring the purity and chemical stability of vanadium electrolytes becomes critical for maintaining performance and extending battery life.The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.spectro.com/products/icp-oes-aes-spectrometers/arcos-inductively-coupled-plasma">SPECTRO ARCOS ICP-OES</a>, equipped with DSOI, delivers enhanced sensitivity and precision, making it particularly effective in detecting trace elements that may affect electrolyte performance. The webinar will outline the instrument’s capacity to meet current quality standards and its potential for future adaptability. The precision offered by the SPECTRO ARCOS ensures that even minor impurities are detected, thus facilitating better control over the electrolyte formulation and enhancing the efficiency of VRFBs in renewable energy applications.The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.spectro.com/products/xrf-spectrometer/xepos-xrf-spectrometer">SPECTRO XEPOS ED-XRF</a>&nbsp;analyzer delivers high sensitivity and flexibility, enabling accurate multi-elemental analysis of vanadium electrolytes, from trace to major components. With detailed experimental data on electrolyte samples at various states, the webinar will highlight how ED-XRF technology can identify and quantify impurities that could impact the efficiency and lifespan of VRFBs.

SPECTRO Analytical Instruments: Elemental Analysis of Vanadium Electrolytes Using ICP-OES and ED-XRF Technology

Elemental Analysis of Vanadium Electrolytes Using ICP-OES and ED-XRF Technology 

This on-demand webinar presents an in-depth analysis of vanadium electrolytes using ICP-OES and ED-XRF technology.

Vanadium Electrolyte Analysis with ICP-OES & ED-XRF

Accurate calibration and consistent instrument performance are essential for reliable results in elemental analysis. This live webinar explores the critical differences between type standard samples and control samples, and how each contributes to the accuracy, precision and stability of analytical workflows. Attendees will gain insight into when and how to apply these standards effectively, particularly in the context of metal analysis using arc/spark optical emission spectrometry (OES) and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF).The session will demonstrate how type standards are used to optimize calibrations for the analysis of specific alloy compositions, while control samples serve as ongoing performance checks to ensure measurement consistency. Using the Spark Analyzer Pro software as an example, this webinar will demonstrate how the relevant standards are integrated and applied within the device software, including correction methods and limit value settings, to maintain high-quality results across production and quality control processes.<h4>Why attend this webinar?</h4><ul><li>Learn how to apply type and control standards to improve measurement accuracy</li><li>Discover best practices for monitoring instrument stability in metal analysis</li><li>See how software integration supports reproducible elemental analysis workflows</li></ul><h4>Who Should Attend:</h4><ul><li>Quality control and process optimization professionals</li><li>Laboratory and production managers in metals industries</li><li>Anyone interested in advanced analytical technologies</li></ul>The webinar will take place on Tuesday, December 16, and will take around 30 minutes, after which we'll answer your questions live.<blockquote>Presenter: Dirk Scholten, Application Specialist Arc/Spark Analyzers</blockquote>

SPECTRO / AMETEK: Understanding the Difference Between Type and Control Standards in Elemental Analysis

Understanding the Difference Between Type and Control Standards in Elemental Analysis

Discover how type and control standards enhance calibration, precision and QC stability in arc/spark OES and XRF analysis, with practical software tips.

Difference Between Type and Standards in Elemental Analysis

Quality driven organizations recognize that preventing material mix-ups begins with reliable verification. Modern manufacturing environments depend on processes that can distinguish unknown alloys from known specifications with confidence – relying solely on labeling is insufficient. Consequently, Positive Material Identification (PMI) is essential for preventing mix-ups and safeguarding product quality.In this live webinar, you’ll learn exactly when to use Grade Identification / Grade Search for unknown materials, and when to rely on Grade Control / Grade Verification to confirm an expected grade quickly and confidently.If you know what the grade should be, verification gives you the fastest, clearest answer: OK or No Match. If you don’t, identification helps you narrow down possible candidates from your grade libraries. Quality minded organizations recognize that they retain ultimate responsibility for ensuring accurate metal verification.<h4>We’ll outline a practical approach for inspecting incoming and outgoing components:</h4><ul><li>Identify unknown metals with grade search</li><li>Verify known grades with a clear match/no match result</li><li>Choose the right tool for each task</li></ul>We’ll demonstrate real world workflows using mobile OES for rapid alloy checks, handheld XRF for quick specification screening, and show how adding grade information enhances results even on stationary OES analyzers.This is rounded out by a brief overview of the SPECTRO metal database – how it works and how it effectively complements the work with the spectrometer.<h4>Why attend:</h4><ul><li>Strengthen quality assurance by aligning verification steps with the right analytical method</li><li>Reduce risk by integrating fast and reliable grade verification into inspection workflows</li><li>Improve decision‑making with structured grade data and proven metal analysis tools</li></ul><h4>Join us live:</h4><ul><li>9:30 AM CET (Berlin); 4:30 PM SGT (Singapore) — Time Slot 1</li><li>11:00 AM EDT (New York); 4:00 PM CET (Berlin) — Time Slot 2</li></ul><blockquote>Presenter: Lars Jenster (Product Support Specialist for the Arc/Spark product line and the handheld XRF SPECTRO xSORT)Lars Jenster offers SPECTRO customers and service engineers worldwide support regarding questions about these instruments. Lars joined SPECTRO as a trainee in 1995 and has remained with the company ever since, during which time he also spent two and a half years working at the SPECTRO subsidiary in the United States.Presenter: Julius Kemper (Product Support Specialist for the Arc/Spark product line)Julius Kemper supports SPECTRO customers and service technicians worldwide and assists with questions about the devices. Julius joined SPECTRO as a trainee in 2021 and has been part of the Arc/Spark Product Support Team since 2023.</blockquote>

SPECTRO / AMETEK: Grade Search or Grade Control: Choosing the Right Method for Reliable Metal Verification

Grade Search or Grade Control: Choosing the Right Method for Reliable Metal Verification

Join this webinar to learn practical PMI workflows, alloy grade verification strategies, and how OES and XRF improve quality assurance and metal identification.

Choosing Right Method for Reliable Metal Verification

Superalloys enable technologies that operate under extreme conditions. These high‑performance materials withstand high temperatures, mechanical stress, and corrosive environments, but they only deliver their full potential when their chemical composition meets specifications. This live webinar explains what superalloys are, where nickel‑, iron‑, and cobalt‑based grades are used, and why tight chemical tolerances make accurate elemental analysis essential throughout the entire lifecycle of a component.Precise elemental analysis protects performance and safety. Incorrect analysis can reduce component lifetime, can increase the risk of failure during operation, and can lead to costly recalls. In this session, you will learn where metal analysis is required—from incoming inspection and in‑process control to positive material identification and final quality checks—and how analytical requirements change between laboratory environments and direct field use.The webinar concludes by connecting application needs with the right analytical approach. It shows how modern metal analysis solutions based on arc/spark optical emission spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence technology (XRF) support reliable decision‑making across inspection, sorting, and quality control. By understanding your analytical requirements first, you can confidently select solutions that deliver fast, precise, and reproducible results.<h4>In this webinar, you will learn how to:</h4><ul><li>Understand what makes superalloys unique and why their composition matters</li><li>Apply elemental analysis at critical control points in production and inspection</li><li>Match analytical requirements with the right metal analysis technology</li></ul><h5>Join us live:</h5><ul><li>10:30 AM CEST (Berlin); 4:30 PM SGT (Singapore) — Time Slot 1</li><li>11:00 AM EDT (New York); 5:00 PM CEST (Berlin) — Time Slot 2</li></ul><blockquote>Presenter: Julia KiesslingComing from the Product Support group for the Arc/Spark product line where she has built comprehensive, in depth knowledge of Arc/Spark spectrometry and having recently transferred into Sales, Julia Kiessling provides SPECTRO customers with support and guidance on spark analyzers. Julia joined SPECTRO as a master’s student in 2021 and has been with SPECTRO since then, during which time she spent three years at the SPECTRO subsidiary in the United States.</blockquote>

AMETEK / SPECTRO: Elemental Analysis of Superalloys: Ensuring Performance in Extreme Applications

Elemental Analysis of Superalloys: Ensuring Performance in Extreme Applications

Discover elemental analysis of superalloys using OES and XRF to ensure quality, safety, and performance across production and inspection.

ICPMS webinars focusing on ICP/OES - page 1