In the week from April 20, the following webinars await you in the field of atomic and molecular spectroscopy and spectrometry<blockquote><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinars">👉 DETAILS AND REGISTRATION IN THE WEBINARS SECTION</a></h4>👉 Search and filter in the largest global database with over 5 500 GC, LC, MS and spectroscopy webinars.</blockquote><h5>1. Metrohm: Copper deposition baths: Advanced analytical solutions for development and monitoring</h5><ul><li>Tu, 21.4.2026 09:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6123">Registration</a></li></ul>Discover a multi-method approach to copper plating bath analysis combining titration, CVS, XRF, and pH measurement for improved process control, data reliability, and production quality.<h5>2. Thermo Fisher Scientific: Lunch and Learn Tips and Tricks Series: Qtegra Part 2</h5><ul><li>Tu, 21.4.2026 12:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/5976">Registration</a></li></ul>Part two explores efficient Qtegra ISDS workflows and integrated tools designed to improve laboratory productivity and enhance trace elemental analysis quality.<h5>3. C&amp;EN: NMR-augmented Workflows: Most Modern Integration into Laboratories</h5><ul><li>Tu, 21.4.2026 17:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6107">Registration</a></li></ul>From high resolution instruments in smaller footprints to smarter software that enhances data quality and streamlines analysis.<h5>4. Agilent Technologies: Accurate Determination of Chlorine Isotope Ratio Analysis by 8900 ICP-MS</h5><ul><li>Tu, 21.4.2026 20:30 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6047">Registration</a></li></ul>This session discusses techniques for low level chlorine analysis and isotope ratio on the 8900 QQQ-ICPMS.<h5>5. SelectScience: What’s in your hydrogen? Analytical toolkits for fuel purity analysis</h5><ul><li>We, 22.4.2026 10:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6055">Registration</a></li></ul>Join this dual-session webinar on hydrogen impurity testing and ISO 14687 fuel quality. Learn how GC, GC-MS, IC, and FTIR workflows support safe, compliant hydrogen production and fuel-cell applications.<h5>6. Bruker: Introduction to Photothermal AFM-IR for Infrared Spectroscopists</h5><ul><li>We, 22.4.2026 17:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6109">Registration</a></li></ul>With photothermal atomic force microscope infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR), chemical identification at the nanoscale is achieved by measuring local IR spectra directly at the AFM tip.<h5>7. Mettler-Toledo: How to Determine Specific Heat Capacity by DSC</h5><ul><li>Th, 23.4.2026 16:00 CET</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/5736">Registration</a></li></ul>Explore six DSC techniques for measuring specific heat capacity and understand its importance in material performance, processing, and safety. Join the live webinar.<h5>8. Bruker: EDS Analysis of Fibers, Polymers, and Ceramics – Best Practices</h5><ul><li>Th, 23.4.2026 17:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/6111">Registration</a></li></ul>Different EDS measurement approaches using conventional geometry and an annular approach (QUANTAX FlatQUAD) making the best choice for challenging analytical tasks.

Webinars LabRulezICPMS Week 17/2026

Proficiency testing (PT) is applicable to quantitative, qualitative and interpretative assessments, but this leaflet will concentrate on PTs for quantitative tests. Participation in PT is an essential part of the quality assurance in analytical laboratories and provides them with many benefits. In PT the provider evaluates the performance of participants against pre-established criteria defined in the design of the PT scheme.<h4>Performance evaluation&nbsp;</h4>The majority of PT schemes involve some form of performance score, such as the z or similar scores1 , and corresponding assessment criteria. An assigned value (xpt) and a standard deviation for proficiency assessment (spt) are determined and used to calculate the performance score of the laboratory result (xi), e.g. the z score with z = (xi - xpt ) / spt<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Eurachem_How_can_proficiency_testing_help_my_laboratory_2_c1bf0b596f.jpg" alt="Eurachem: How can proficiency testing help my laboratory?" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Eurachem_How_can_proficiency_testing_help_my_laboratory_2_c1bf0b596f.jpg 195w," sizes="100vw" width="952" height="761">Assessment of z scores is based on the following criteria:&nbsp;<ul><li>|z| ≤ 2.0 is regarded as satisfactory;&nbsp;</li><li>2.0 &lt; |z| &lt; 3.0 is regarded as questionable (‘warning signal’);&nbsp;</li><li>|z| ≥ 3.0 is regarded as unsatisfactory (‘action signal’).&nbsp;</li></ul>This is based on the concept that normally distributed analytical results lie within two standard deviations with a probability of ca. 95 %, and within three standard deviations with a probability of 99.7 %.&nbsp;PT providers have several options to determine spt such as prescribed/perceived desirable analytical performance or the observed distribution of data. The spt used by the PT provider may not be appropriate for all laboratories. If justified, the participants may then calculate their own z score using an alternative spt value which is fit for their purpose.&nbsp;<h4>Corrective actions</h4>Unsatisfactory performance scores (‘action signal’) indicate possible problems in the analysis undertaken. The laboratory must investigate this (e.g. by checking for transcription/calculation errors, trueness and precision) and, if necessary, address the problems through appropriate corrective actions. Participation in the PT provides very limited benefits to the laboratory, if unsatisfactory performance scores are not acted upon.<h4>Evaluation of results over time&nbsp;</h4>In addition to internal quality control, regular participation in PT enables laboratories to monitor their performance over time and to identify trends before these become problems. Performance scores obtained from subsequent PT rounds can be plotted in a control chart.&nbsp;<h4>Method comparisons&nbsp;</h4>Where PT schemes require participants to report details of the method used, the PT report may enable the participant to compare the performance of their method with that of other methods used.&nbsp;<h4>Use of PT data to estimate bias&nbsp;</h4>The bias of a method should be established using certified reference materials (CRMs) or comparison with a reference method. However, these may not be available for all matrices, analytes and levels, or CRMs may not be fully representative of the real test samples. Participation in PT provides the opportunity to check the bias taking into account the effects of matrix and concentration variation, provided that a reliable estimate of the “true value” is assigned in the PT. Participation in several PT rounds also provides information on the bias variability which can be used as a contribution in the laboratory evaluation of the measurement uncertainty.&nbsp;<h4>Use of PT to check measurement uncertainties&nbsp;</h4>The ζ (zeta) score can help to check the plausibility of the laboratory’s measurement uncertainty estimate. It is calculated as follows:<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Eurachem_zeta_score_calculation_b70d8b1187.jpg" alt="Eurachem: Zeta score calculation" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Eurachem_zeta_score_calculation_b70d8b1187.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="423" height="188">where xi is the laboratory’s result, xpt the assigned value, and u(xi) and u(xpt) are their respective standard uncertainties.&nbsp;The assessment criteria for satisfactory, questionable and unsatisfactory results are the same as for the z score. The uncertainty reported by a laboratory for its measurement result is an estimate of the accuracy that the laboratory claims to reach. If ζ scores are outside the acceptable range, this shows that the laboratory is not able to fulfill its own requirements. In other words the measurement uncertainty is underestimated.&nbsp;Additionally, the standard measurement uncertainty of a laboratory result can be expected to be lower than the reproducibility observed in the proficiency test. If the measurement uncertainty is much lower the uncertainty estimate should be reviewed.&nbsp;<h4>Demonstration of competence&nbsp;</h4>Successful participation in PT (| z | ≤ 2.0) is often seen as a proof of competence to customers, accreditation bodies and regulatory authorities. PT can also provide a valuable educational element to the laboratory, for example it can indicate the success of staff training or where additional training is required.&nbsp;<h4>More information / further reading&nbsp;</h4>B. Brookman and I. Mann (eds.) Eurachem Guide: Selection, Use and Interpretation of Proficiency Testing (PT) Schemes (3rd ed. 2021). Information about PT providers and schemes can be obtained from your national accreditation body, from the EPTIS website (www.eptis.org) or from other national or international organisations.

How can proficiency testing help my laboratory?

Our Library never stops expanding. What are the most recent contributions to LabRulezICPMS Library in the week of 20th April 2026? Check out new documents from the field of spectroscopy/spectrometry and related techniques!<blockquote>👉 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library">SEARCH THE LARGEST REPOSITORY OF DOCUMENTS ABOUT SPECTROSCOPY/SPECTROMETRY RELATED TECHNIQUES</a></blockquote><blockquote>👉 Need info about different analytical techniques? Peek into <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezLCMS</a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezGCMS</a> libraries.</blockquote>This week we bring you white paper by Metrohm and application notes by Shimadzu, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Waters Corporation!<h3>1. Metrohm: Why switch to OMNIS Client/Server (C/S)?</h3><ul><li>Other document</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/WP_097_EN_3a0ff88144.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul>This White Paper outlines the key benefits of <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=220&amp;search=OMNIS+software">OMNIS</a>, highlighting its scalability, cost-saving potential, and the positive impact it lends to overall business performance. The following sections cover more specific advantages of OMNIS, providing detailed insights into how this innovative solution can transform server management and drive significant cost reductions. Whether you are a small business looking to optimize your IT infrastructure or a large enterprise seeking to enhance operational efficiency, OMNIS offers a robust and scalable solution that can meet your needs.&nbsp;The cost savings for two different scenarios are calculated in this White Paper: medium- and large-scale organizations. For mid-sized environments involving 20 laboratory locations, the OMNIS Client/Server solution offers significant savings by reducing the number of servers tenfold—from 20 to just 2. For large-scale organizations with 60 laboratory locations worldwide, the solution enables substantial cost reductions by decreasing the number of servers from 60 to 6. These calculations demonstrate the scalability and costeffectiveness of the OMNIS Client/Server solution across various customer environments.<h4>COMPARISON OF TIAMO™ MULTI AND OMNIS CLIENT/SERVER&nbsp;</h4><h5>SCALABILITY&nbsp;</h5>tiamo™ multi Limitations&nbsp;A dedicated tiamo™ multi server is needed for each laboratory location.OMNIS C/S Advantages&nbsp;OMNIS C/S offers exceptional scalability, allowing businesses to easily expand their server infrastructure as needed. This means that as the business grows, OMNIS can seamlessly accommodate increased demand without compromising performance or efficiency. OMNIS is designed to scale up over many locations and countries without any negative impact on performance in a wide area network installation (WAN). By reducing the number of servers required to support operations, OMNIS C/S helps organizations achieve significant cost savings. This includes lower hardware costs, reduced energy consumption, and decreased maintenance expenses, resulting in substantial annual savings.<h5>ANALYSIS METHODS</h5>tiamo™ multi Limitations&nbsp;tiamo™ was designed as a pure titration measurement software solution.OMNIS C/S Advantages&nbsp;OMNIS is designed as a multiple measurement technology platform currently supporting titration, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, and process analytics. The platform will be continuously extended to support even more measurement technologies and devices in the future<h4>CONCLUSION&nbsp;</h4>The OMNIS Client/Server solution offers a transformative approach to managing server infrastructure for laboratory environments through centralization. By leveraging its unique scaling features, OMNIS enables significant cost savings and increased operational efficiency for both medium- and large-scale organizations.<h3>2. Shimadzu: Measurement of Fixed Carbon, Volatile Matter, and Ash of Biocoke</h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_01_01136_en_c6a762bf92.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul><h4>User Benefits</h4><ul><li>The fixed carbon, volatile matter, and ash of biocoke can be measured by the DTG-60.</li><li>The combustion characteristics of biocoke can also be evaluated by using the DTG-60.</li><li>TG-DTA measurement can simultaneously grasp the endothermic and exothermic behaviors during pyrolysis and combustion, allowing a more comprehensive evaluation.</li></ul>Biocoke is a type of solid fuel produced using plant-derived organic resources (biomass) as the raw materials. Biocoke enables high-temperature combustion over an extended time period, and has also attracted attention as a zero-emission fuel which does not generate waste in the production process. It is produced by heating biomass under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions. A stable fuel with high compressive strength can be obtained by this process, allowing easy transportation and storage, as well as long-term preservation. As a fuel for industrial furnaces and boilers, biocoke is used as a substitute for conventional fossil fuels. It is also expected to be used as a sustainable energy source because its CO2 emissions are lower than those of fossil fuels. The diversity of the raw materials that can be used to produce biocoke, which include woody materials and agricultural residues, is also another feature.&nbsp;In this article, the volatile matter, fixed carbon, and ash of biocokes produced from waste wood and buckwheat husks were evaluated using a Shimadzu DTG-60 simultaneous TG/DTA.<h4>Evaluation of Combustion Characteristics by TG-DTA Measurement</h4>TG-DTA measurements of the size-adjusted waste wood biocoke and buckwheat husk biocoke were conducted under an air atmosphere.<ul><li>Instrument: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=DTG-60">DTG-60&nbsp;</a></li><li>Heating rate: 10 ˚C/min&nbsp;</li><li>Temperature range: 30 ˚C - 700 ˚C&nbsp;</li><li>Sample weight: 8 mg&nbsp;</li><li>Atmosphere: Air</li></ul><h4>Conclusion</h4>The combustion characteristics and fixed carbon content of waste wood biocoke and buckwheat husk biocoke were evaluated using a DTG-60 simultaneous TG/DTA. TG-DTA measurement is an effective method which can determine the combustion characteristics of biocokes under an air atmosphere and the composition ratio of the volatile matter, fixed carbon, and ash under a nitrogen atmosphere. Moreover, TG-DTA enables a more comprehensive evaluation, as the endothermic and exothermic behaviors during pyrolysis and combustion can be measured simultaneously. Since the properties of various types of biocokes differ depending on the raw material used and the production conditions, TG-DTA measurement is also useful for comparative studies of biocoke quality. In addition, when a mixture of various types of biomass is to be used, it is important to know the carbon content (fixed carbon content) of each raw material.<h3>3. Thermo Fisher Scientific: Classification of polyethylene by Raman spectroscopy</h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/AN_52301_classification_polyethylene_Raman_spectroscopy_app_note_05122821c5.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul>Polyethylene (PE) is one of the most common plastics in the world with annual global production of around 80 million tons.1 Based on density, polyethylene is generally classified as high-density polyethylene (HDPE, &gt; 0.940 g/cm3 ) or low-density polyethylene (LDPE, &lt; 0.930 g/cm3 ).2 These different density polyethylene’s have vastly different physical, chemical, and mechanical properties, and hence are used in different applications. For example, HDPE is primarily used for milk jugs, detergent bottles, garbage containers, and water pipes, due to its high tensile strength; LDPE, on the other hand, has a lower tensile strength and is used mainly for plastic bags and wraps. Therefore, density is one the most important properties of polyethylene, and classifying them according to their density is essential for proper PE specification.&nbsp;Bulk PEs are manufactured as pellets (resins, granules), and later converted to other forms (such as films and pipes) using extrusion or molding processes. They are also made into multilayer films for a wide range of industrial applications like food and consumer product packaging. The density of bulk PE pellets and single-layer PE films can be measured and classified with relative ease using several standard techniques: ISO 1183-1/ASTM D792 (immersion method),3 ISO 1183-2/ASTM D1505 (density gradient method),4 and ASTM D4883 (ultrasound method).5 However, all these techniques require the PE in its “pure” form, which can be challenging in the case of PE in multilayer films. Extensive sample preparations (microtoming, separation of layers by dissolving in solvents) are often required6 to isolate the PE layer before analysis, which can be labor-intensive and time-consuming.&nbsp;Raman spectroscopy is sensitive to changes in the molecular structure level of PE, such as the degree of crystallinity, which is the key determining factor of PE density.7,8 More importantly, the confocal capability of Raman microscopy allows for facile in situ analysis of individual PE layers in multilayer films without the need to isolate the PE layer. To our best knowledge, PE density measurement using Raman has been limited to PE pellets.7,8 In this work, we want to systematically explore the feasibility of using confocal Raman microscopy for PE film density analysis, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We demonstrate that Raman microscopy in combination with the discriminant analysis method can be successfully applied to distinguish HDPE and LDPE in both pellet and film forms.<h4>Experimental</h4><h5>Method description</h5>A <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=3&amp;search=DXR2+Raman+microscope">Thermo Scientific™ DXR2 Raman Microscope</a> was used for the collection of Raman data. For each type/class of the pellet samples, Raman spectra were collected from 3 different pellets and averaged. For each film sample, Raman spectra were collected from 3-4 locations across the surface of the sample. An averaged spectrum was then used for final analysis.A 532 nm laser was used with a 2 mW laser power at the sample. A 10x objective and a 50 μm slit aperture were used to obtain more representative spectra from the samples. Total acquisition time for each spectrum was 30 seconds (3 second exposure x 10 exposures). Thermo Scientific™ OMNIC™ software was used for operation of the DXR2 Raman Microscope, and collection of Raman spectra; Thermo Scientific™ TQ Analyst™ software was used for chemometric analysis of the Raman data.<h4>Conclusion</h4>In this application note, we have successfully demonstrated the use of a Thermo Scientific DXR2 Raman Microscope, in combination with the TQ Analyst software, to classify polyethylene’s of different density classes in both pellet and film forms. Raman spectroscopy is nondestructive and requires minimal sample preparation. The classification method was created solely based on the Raman spectral features of LDPE and HDPE and was indifferent to the sample forms. Once the method is established, PE samples, pellets or films, can be correctly classified within minutes. Moreover, this work expands the scope of the previously reported study on PE pellets to include PE films, which broadens its applicability in the plastic/ polymer industry as well as many downstream industries. The described methodology should be applicable for in situ classification of thin PE layer(s) in multilayer films. The data were collected using an older model instrument DXR2 Raman microscope. Currently, Thermo Fisher Scientific offers an improved model, the DXR3 Raman Microscope, which offers superior speed and performance over its predecessor model.<h3>4. Waters Corporation: Rapidly Distinguish Protein from Non-Protein Particles in Biologic Formulations</h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/720009101_en_b4370d547c.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul>Current subvisible analysis techniques make accurate particle identification virtually impossible. Light obscuration (LO) is a low refractive index contrast particle counting method which cannot distinguish between different particle types. Flow imaging (FI) techniques provide more information than LO, including particle images, morphological parameters and optical characteristics of particles. However, none of these features definitively identify the type of particle imaged. Flow imagers for example cannot distinguish between plastic, protein, and degraded polysorbate which are all very similar in morphology. Technologies available for detailed chemical composition ID such as Raman microscopy/spectroscopy have been used to fill in the gaps left by particle counters; however, they are tedious, require lots of expertise and extensive signal processing, and have the throughput of a single particle per several minutes of use, making the technique useful only to expert users during failure mode analysis.&nbsp;In order to fully characterize particulates and aggregates in biopharmaceutical product formulations, further information about the identity of all the particulates is crucial. Regulatory agencies expect drug manufacturers to move away from simple counting techniques and apply multiple and orthogonal methods to complement compendial methods.&nbsp;In this application note we introduce fluorescence membrane microscopy (FMM). FMM, exclusively available in the Aura™ System, is a high throughput, low volume, subvisible particle identification technology. FMM enables ultra-fast, 100% sampling efficiency, characterizing all particles from a single protein aggregate to tens of millions of particles in an entire multi-sample formulation, in under two hours.<h4>Experimental</h4>Fluorescence membrane microscopy (FMM) is a novel particle identification method that builds on backgrounded membrane imaging (BMI) to identify, categorize, and further scrutinize the most common particles in an entire bioformulation sample by using established extrinsic fluorescent dye chemistries.&nbsp;BMI, the backbone analysis technology used in the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/products/2190">Aura</a> and <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=5&amp;search=horizon">Horizon®</a> instruments, images a 96-well membrane plate before and after sample filtration, and conducts novel, high optical contrast image analysis to resolve particles from 1 µm to 5 mm in size, with a large &gt;36/mL counts dynamic range. Using fluorescent dyes, biopharmaceutical particles are stained and analyzed with FMM to confirm and quantify their presence. To enable FMM, Aura uses new membrane plates specifically manufactured to support labeled fluorescent workflows.<h4>Conclusion</h4>FMM using ThT allows one to conduct high throughput, low volume and specific protein/non-protein particle analysis. The power of FMM using ThT is the ability to obtain protein/non-protein ID for a whole 96-well plate assay down to a single individual particle in less than 90 minutes. ThT’s high solubility and specificity to protein aggregates makes it possible to differentiate protein aggregates from particles with similar morphology and refractive index like plastics and fatty acids. Compared to spectroscopic techniques, the throughput of FMM is 1000x higher, while using best in class particle sizing and counting analysis that has its roots in the wellestablished membrane microscopy found in USP 788.

News from LabRulezICPMS Library - Week 17, 2026

Article

Webinars

Application

Academy

Eurachem is a European network promoting international traceability of chemical measurements and good analytical practice. It provides expert guidance, supports method validation, uncertainty evaluation, proficiency testing, and facilitates discussion on technical and policy issues in analytical quality.

Eurachem

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Separation Science

Agilent Technologies

Extractables and leachables (E&amp;Ls) analysis is challenging and requires complete confidence in the results to ensure regulatory compliance. No single analytical tool can analyze all E&Ls; we offer diverse analytical technologies and expertise for the accurate identification and quantification of potential E&amp;Ls.
In this webinar our experts will discuss current regulatory updates, holistic and comprehensive analytical workflow strategies for quick scouting, profiling &amp; quantification of wide spectrum E&amp;L impurities and answer any questions you may have.
<h3>You would learn:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Regulatory updates on Extractables &amp; Leachables;</li>
<li>Overall comprehensive approach &amp; strategies to screen, detect, identify &amp; quantify Extractable &amp; Leachable compounds in various Pharma &amp; Biopharmaceutical drugs;</li>
<li>Analytical Technologies portfolio &amp; decision making software for complex studies of targeted &amp; non-targeted Extractables &amp; Leachables.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Who should attend:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Extractables &amp; Leachables analysts and laboratory managers; </li>
<li>Researchers interested in Extractables &amp; Leachables studies in Pharma/Biopharma/Medical Device/Polymer Manufacturing/CRO’s/CMO’s and others;</li>
<li>Analysts performing untargeted analyses including drug impurity profiling;</li>
<li>Quality Assurance experts in the above industries.</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Antonio Chana (Product Specialist Liquid Phase Separation, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Antonio Chana, Ph. D. in chemistry and Agilent product specialist in liquid phase separation for Spain and Portugal. He joined Agilent from the pharmaceutical industry where he has held positions of analytical development manager, QC manager and laboratory manager among others.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Zainul Abid CKV (Product Specialist - Spectroscopy, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Dr Zainul Abid is a product specialist with Agilent Technologies India Pvt Ltd based in Bangalore. He has several years of research and application development experience in Molecular spectroscopy domain. His expertise includes infrared spectroscopy and imaging, Raman spectroscopy and imaging, UV-Vis and NIR spectroscopy etc. He actively works with different industry experts to set up high-end spectroscopy laboratories.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Soma Dasgupta (PhD Application Engineer, GC/GCMS, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Soma received her PhD from the University of Pune, India and joined Agilent in 2016 and specializes in areas including multi-residue method development; pesticides and environmental applications and genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals. Prior to joining Agilent Technologies, she performed her doctorate research at the University of Pune in conjunction with the National Research Centre for Grapes where she concentrated on developing comprehensive methods for analysis of agro-chemicals in fruits and vegetables. She has worked with Thermo Fisher Scientific as Application Specialist for GC and GC-MS. Once joining Agilent, she is responsible for solutions meet our customers&#39; analytical needs. Her specialties include multi-residue method development; pesticides and environmental applications and genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals. She has more than 25 publications in peer-reviewed journals and application notes to her credit and a book chapter as well.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Prasanth Joseph (Presales Application Engineer- LCMS, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Prasanth Joseph is working as Application Engineer at Agilent Center of Excellence, Bangalore. He is having more than 16 years of experience in handling LC-MS/MS for various small molecule applications.His expertise includes MRM based screening and quantitation of various chemical residues in food commodities and pharma applications such as impurity profiling, genotoxic impurity quantitation and analysis of extractables and leachables in various packaging systems.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Vinay Jain (COE Manager, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Dr Vinay Jain, working as COE Manager and ICP-MS Application Scientist at Agilent Technologies India. He is Ph.D. on analytical chemistry. He has more than 30 years of analytical and research experience in spectroscopic techniques (LC-ICPMS, GC-ICPMS, ICP-MS QQQ, ICP-MS, ICP-OES, AAS, XRF, XRD) and expertise in various market segments such as Pharma, Food &amp; Farm products, Packaging, Chemical, Clinical, Environment, Petroleum, Ayurveda &amp; Herbal. His area of specialization includes new analytical method development and validation as per regulatory guidelines. He has completed more than 28 research projects with various research and regulatory organizations, of national and international importance. He is having two patents, six research paper publication; two chapters in various international handbooks and five Agilent application notes in his credit. Received TechInnovation Award in 2020 from Agilent Technologies India.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Mitigating the Risk of Extractables & Leachables Analysis - Regulatory Updates & Analytical Workflow Strategies

Mitigating the Risk of Extractables & Leachables Analysis - Regulatory Updates & Analytical Workflow Strategies

The rapid growth of the cannabis industry has provided a rare opportunity for scientists to be part of an emerging field. &nbsp;With that expansion, concerns related to the growth, extraction, and chemical analysis of cannabis have also increased. &nbsp;As new jurisdictions allow for cannabis, a disparate and constantly evolving compliance world has been created. &nbsp;Ideas for leveraging the research capabilities of academics to enhance problem solving and workflow optimization when working with the cannabis industry will be presented.Key Learning Objectives:<ul><li>Strategies for building a strong team in a cannabis facility</li><li>Approaches for addressing challenges of cannabis analysis</li><li>Understanding the intersection of product quality and safety</li></ul>Who Should Attend:<ul><li>Future or current cannabis lab managers</li><li>Future or current cannabis testing lab analysts and chemists</li><li>Entrepreneurs considering starting a cannabis testing lab</li></ul>For any questions please contact Jordan Ramesh: <a href="mailto:jramesh@mjhlifesciences.com">jramesh@mjhlifesciences.com</a><blockquote>Presenter: Steven Johnson, Ph.D. (Dean, College of Science and the Environment, Lake Superior State University)Dr. Steven Johnson earned his PhD in chemistry from Michigan Technological University focusing on heterologous expression of proteins. After completing a postdoctoral position working on the use of the botulinum toxin for the delivery of therapeutic cargo to neural cells, he accepted a faculty position at the University of New England. In 2013, Dr. Johnson returned to the Upper Peninsula of Michigan to join the faculty at Lake Superior State University. During his time at LSSU, he has served as co-chair for the School of Physical Science, chair for the School of Science and Medicine, and now, as Dean for the College of Science and the Environment. As Dean, LSSU introduced a bachelor’s degree in Cannabis Chemistry, which prepares graduates for the burgeoning cannabis sector in the State of Michigan and beyond.Presenter:&nbsp;Ryan Ratzloff (CEO/President, Lion Labs)Ryan Ratzloff has been a part of the cannabis industry in Michigan since its early, caregiver-based days. With over 10 years of experience in growing, processing, and marketing cannabis-based products, Ryan and the Lion Labs Ltd organization have established a standard of excellence across several categories with their award-winning and successful brands: Element, Dream, and RISE. Ryan also brings 10+ years of CPG experience from his early career at PepsiCo.Presenter: Anthony Macherone, Ph.D. (Strategic Technical Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)Dr. Macherone leads a team of scientists for the development and deployment of analytical testing methodologies for cannabis and hemp products. Anthony has written extensively on cannabis testing and contributed several chapters to books about cannabis. In June 2020, Anthony joined Cannabis Science and Technology®’s Editorial Advisory Board.&nbsp;Presenter:&nbsp;Derek Wright, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Environmental Science, Lake Superior State University)Dr. Derek Wright is an Associate Professor of Environmental Science at Lake Superior State University. Dr. Wright earned his Ph.D. in Environmental Science from Rutgers University in 2008, with an emphasis of the biogeochemical cycles of trace elements in the marine systems. In his more than 20 years of experience with trace element analysis, he has extensive experience in ICP-MS (quadrupole and sector field), ICP-OES, MP-AES, and AAS. He has utilized these techniques for the accurate and precise measurement of challenging sample types such as seawater, hydrothermal vent fluids, atmospheric deposition, biological tissues, soils, foods, and sediments.During his time at LSSU, he has served as chair for the School of Physical Sciences, and taught coursework in Environmental Science, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Health. In addition to trace element analysis his research also utilizes microbial source tracking methods.Presenter:&nbsp; Alexander Adams (CEO, Cambium Analytica)Alexander Adams is the Co-Founder and CEO of Cambium Analytica, an analytical laboratory Traverse City, MI that is a full service provider of regulatory compliance testing, product research &amp; development, and quality assurance / quality control services to the cannabis industry. He received a degree in Plant Biology from Michigan State University and has spent the past decade working in many areas of Michigan’s specialty crop agriculture industry.Presenter:&nbsp;Dr. Markus Roggen (President/CSO, Delic Labs)Dr. Markus Roggen is President and Chief Scientific Officer of Delic Labs, a licensed cannabis and psilocybin research laboratory focused on extraction optimization, analytical testing, and process development. Delic Labs is one of a handful of research labs licensed for both cannabis and psilocybin in Canada. Delic Labs was initially founded as Complex Biotech Discovery Ventures by Dr. Roggen and Prof. Dr. Glenn Sammis in 2018, and rebranded after the sale to Delic Corp.Dr. Roggen received his M/Sci degree from Imperial College, London, UK in 2008. He then pursued his graduate degree in organic chemistry at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zürich (ETHZ), where he received his PhD in 2012. Dr. Roggen was awarded an DAAD postdoctoral fellowship to pursue further training in physical organic chemistry at The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla in 2013-2014. He then entered the cannabis industry in 2014 and since has held executive positions in analytical and production companies. His research into process optimization and analytical methods has been recognized with a number of awards, ElSohley Award of the ACS, Cannabis Scientist Power List 2020 &amp; 2021, 40 under 40 by Marijuana Venture Magazine among others. Dr. Roggen is also a trusted advisor and mentor to multiple startups, startup accelerators and organizations.Presenter:&nbsp;R. Adam Mosey, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Chemistry, Lake Superior State University)Adam Mosey earned his PhD in Chemistry from Michigan State University and completed a postdoctoral appointment at the University of Pittsburgh before joining Lake Superior State University as an assistant professor in 2012. His research background lies the areas of organic synthesis and drug development. He currently teaches courses in Organic Chemistry, Cannabis Chemistry, and Molecular Spectroscopy, and his current research interests involve reaction development, drug design, NMR method development, and methods of cannabinoid extraction and characterization.Presenter:&nbsp;Jonathan Kane, Ph.D. (Chief Scientific Officer, Lion Labs)Prior to entering the cannabis space, Dr. Kane has a demonstrated history of working in preclinical research with a focus on cancer and stem cell biology and success in biotech sales focusing on preclinical radiation-based research systems. Since leaving the preclinical research space in 2018, Jonathan have taken the role as Co-Founder and Chief Scientific Officer at Lion Labs, a medical and adult-use state licensed cannabis processor located in Michigan. Jonathan received his PhD in Biomedical and Biological Sciences in 2016 from Oakland University.</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Agilent Webinars On Demand

Grow Your Skills in the Budding Cannabis Industry 2-Day Symposium (Day 1)

Ideas for leveraging the research capabilities of academics to enhance problem solving and workflow optimization when working with the cannabis industry

Grow Your Skills in the Budding Cannabis Industry (Day 1)

<h5>By attending this webinar, you will learn about:</h5><ul><li>The most common causes of unplanned downtime and inconsistent results, and what you can do to reduce this unplanned downtime.</li><li>New sample introduction components for ICP-OES that improve analytical performance and reduce blockages when analyzing challenging sample matrices.</li><li>Essential operational tips and guidelines that can help you improve the performance of your ICP-OES when analyzing challenging sample matrices.</li></ul><h5>Event Overview</h5>Improving efficiency in routine analyses in your lab is crucial and should be a priority for any lab. Running challenging sample matrices using the ICP-OES technique poses many challenges for your analysts. They risk unplanned downtime from potential nebulizer or injector blockage, or other sample related issues. This sacrifices your sample throughput as your analysts need to first solve the issues – and then re-run samples where the results have been impacted by the loss of sensitivity from the partial or complete blockage. Challenging sample matrices can also increase your cost of ownership as components that wear need more frequent replacement.In this webinar, we'll provide an overview of some new sample introduction components that remove those pain points around running challenging sample matrices by ICP-OES efficiently. We’ll highlight the unique design features that enhance the total dissolved solid and particle handling capabilities, reducing the risk of nebulizer and injector blockage.We’ll demonstrate the capabilities of this robust sample introduction system with two challenging sample matrices, including used lubricating oils, where carbon build-up and larger wear metal particles can create a blockage risk. The second matrix is “black mass” – the material created when lithium-ion batteries are shredded and processed in battery recycling facilities. This complex mixture includes high concentrations of valuable minerals including lithium, which can cause rapid and premature degradation of the injector, combined with insoluble suspended carbon particles, which can also create a blockage risk.<h5>Who Should Attend:</h5>This webinar is recommended for any analyst or lab manager looking to improve efficiency and reduce downtime in their routine analysis workflows when running challenging sample matrices with their ICP-OES analyses, by utilizing a robust sample introduction system.<blockquote>Presenter: James Dellis (ICP-OES Supplies Product Manager, Agilent, Melbourne, Australia)James graduated from Swinburne University of Technology with a Bachelor of Science degree majoring in Chemistry and Biochemistry. Prior to joining Agilent, he worked within the Geochemical and Precious Metal industry. James joined Agilent in 2017 as an R&amp;D Applications Chemist for Supplies Product Development and is now the ICP-OES and Molecular Supplies Product Manager. He has over 13 years' experience in Analytical Chemistry and Atomic Spectroscopy. He is based at Agilent’s Spectroscopy Technology Innovation Centre in Melbourne, Australia.Presenter: Alejandro Amorin (Atomic Spectroscopy Applications Chemist, Agilent, Melbourne, Australia)Alejandro Amorin graduated from Universidad Central de Venezuela in Caracas, Venezuela with a Bachelor of Science degree with Honors, majoring in Chemistry. Prior to joining Agilent, Alejandro worked as a Research Chemist with DCG Partnership, developing new calibration standard blends for GC methods. Alejandro joined Agilent in 2012 as an Applications Chemist. He has worked on development of new spectroscopy consumables and provided applications support for Agilent spectroscopy instrument users around the world. Through his work experience, he has years of hands-on experience in diverse instrumental analysis techniques, including GC, IC, HPLC, AAS &amp; ICP combined with classical wet chemistry techniques. He is based at Agilent’s Spectroscopy Technology Innovation Centre in Melbourne, Australia.Presenter: Eric Vanclay (Marketing Director - Spectroscopy Supplies, Agilent, Melbourne, Australia)Eric Vanclay graduated from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia with a Bachelor of Science degree majoring in Chemistry in 1985, and has since completed further postgraduate studies in Marketing. He joined Varian in 1988 and has worked in a number of roles including Atomic Absorption Product Specialist, Atomic Absorption Product Manager, Export Marketing Manager, European Field Sales/Applications Specialist (atomic spectroscopy), ICP-OES Product Manager and MP-AES Product Manager. After the acquisition of Varian by Agilent, Eric took on the role of Spectroscopy Supplies Marketing Manager, with responsibility for field sales support, customer support, product development and marketing of the spectroscopy supplies. He has over 30 years' experience with all of the atomic spectroscopy techniques. He is based at Agilent’s Spectroscopy Technology Innovation Centre in Melbourne, Australia.</blockquote>

Separation Science: Improving Efficiency with Challenging ICP-OES Applications Utilizing a Robust Sample Introduction System

Improving Efficiency with Challenging ICP-OES Applications Utilizing a Robust Sample Introduction System

We'll provide an overview of some new sample introduction components that remove pain points around running challenging sample matrices by ICP-OES efficiently. 