<p><strong>Although modern agriculture needs to be based on accurate real-time data on soil, plant, and environmental conditions, affordable, sufficiently sensitive, and robust monitoring devices for this purpose are currently missing. According to scientists, low-cost sensors based on new smart materials and printing technologies offer a suitable solution. The results of multidisciplinary research thus far and proposals for the development of these devices have been presented by researchers from Czechia, Great Britain, Spain, and the USA in a review article in the prestigious journal </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-68778-6#Abs1"><i><strong>Nature Communications</strong></i></a><strong>.</strong></p><p>“<i>Sensor technologies for monitoring plant health are still in their infancy. Only simple sensors capable of monitoring basic parameters such as pH, soil moisture, or temperature are commonly available on the market. However, if farmers are to face current challenges, including climate change, and ensure sufficient food for humanity, they need much more effective tools that will enable them to monitor, for example, various pathogens, including bacteria and fungi. In our opinion, a suitable solution is a combination of new smart materials and printing for the production of inexpensive, durable, and scalable materials</i>,” said the article’s first author, <strong>David Panáček</strong> from CATRIN, who worked on the study during his internship at Imperial College London.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CATRIN_Soucasne_senzory_nestaci_Vedci_navrhuji_novou_cestu_ke_sledovani_zdravi_rostlin_b4014952a3.jpg" alt="CATRIN: David Panáček" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CATRIN_Soucasne_senzory_nestaci_Vedci_navrhuji_novou_cestu_ke_sledovani_zdravi_rostlin_b4014952a3.jpg 208w," sizes="100vw" width="1536" height="1152"></p><p>Sensors for monitoring plant health, for example, lag behind similar devices used in human medicine. According to the authors, advances in materials science, which will enable the development of scalable sensor technologies, play a key role in this potential shift. “<i>Printing techniques, including inkjet printing, screen printing, aerosol printing, 3D printing, and direct laser writing, offer flexible ways to produce flexible sensors, large-area sensors, and sensors integrated directly into plants. The review article summarizes recent advances in printable low-dimensional materials for agricultural sensors, analyzes their physico-chemical properties in relation to sensor performance, and discusses key challenges and future opportunities requiring interdisciplinary integration</i>,” said one of the corresponding authors, <strong>Michal Otyepka</strong>.</p><p>The research brought together materials scientists, chemists, biologists, sensing experts, and printing technology specialists. Materials research and the use of graphene-based smart materials were led by scientists from CATRIN at Palacký University and VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava. Plant biologists from CATRIN contributed their knowledge of plant development, their responses to stress conditions, and the monitoring of their properties. Researchers from Imperial College London took care of the electronics, while representatives from<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/companies/36"><strong> CEITEC – VUT</strong></a> focused on printing technologies. The team also included leading experts in sensing from the Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Barcelona, and Joseph Wang of the University of California San Diego, the “father of sensing and electrochemistry,” also contributed his extensive knowledge.</p><p>“<i>This is a groundbreaking study on this topic, which has managed to attract some truly big names in their respective fields. Last but not least, the study demonstrates that interdisciplinarity at CATRIN gives rise to completely new and promising research topics, such as plant sensing and its use for studying plant-environment interactions and smart agriculture,</i>” added another corresponding author, <strong>Nuria De Diego</strong>.</p>

Current sensors are not good enough. Scientists propose a new way to monitor plant health

<p><strong>In the week from February 16, the following webinars await you in the field of atomic and molecular spectroscopy and spectrometry</strong></p><blockquote><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinars"><strong>👉 DETAILS AND REGISTRATION IN THE WEBINARS SECTION</strong></a></h4><p><strong>👉 Search and filter in the largest global database</strong> with over <strong>5 000 GC, LC, MS and spectroscopy webinars</strong>.</p></blockquote><h5><strong>1. Thermo Fisher Scientific: The Perfect Pair for GMP Compliance – IonicX and TruScan for Raw Material Identification and Verification</strong></h5><ul><li>Tu, 17.2.2026 20:00 CET</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/5835">Registration</a></li></ul><p>Learn how the IonicX™ Portable XRF Analyzer enables rapid, at-line identification of ionic salts in GMP manufacturing, delivering real-time PASS/FAIL results and streamlined raw material verification.</p><h5><strong>2. Milestone: Reliable Mercury Analysis in Environmental Samples – Tools, Techniques, and Best Practices</strong></h5><ul><li>Th, 19.2.2026 16:00 CET</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/5804">Registration</a></li></ul><p>Episode 3 focuses on reliable mercury analysis in environmental samples, demonstrating how direct analysis simplifies workflows, reduces contamination risks, and delivers accurate results without digestion.</p><h5><strong>3. Agilent Technologies: Learn How to Confirm Your Data on ICP-OES – Are You Getting the Right Result?</strong></h5><ul><li>Th, 19.2.2026 20:00 CET</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/webinar/2785">Registration</a></li></ul><p>This webinar discusses accuracy and precision in ICP-OES analysis and practical strategies to ensure reliable and defensible results.</p>

Webinars LabRulezICPMS Week 08/2026

<p><strong>Metalloproteins play essential roles in marine phytoplankton, yet their metalloproteomes remain poorly characterized. This study combines protein modeling, quantitative proteomics, and ICP-MS measurements to assess metal requirements across several phytoplankton species, including chlorophytes, a haptophyte, and a cyanobacterium.</strong></p><p>Results show strong agreement between proteome-inferred metal demands and measured cellular metal quotas, while providing deeper insight into biological functions. Mg-containing proteins were most abundant overall, with Zn, Fe, and Mn as dominant trace cofactors. Distinct differences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic phytoplankton were observed, and strain-level analysis demonstrated how metalloproteomes reflect environmental adaptation and metal limitation strategies.</p><blockquote><h4><strong>The original article</strong></h4><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233"><strong>Unlocking Phytoplankton Metallomes with Comparative Analysis of Metal Quotas, Quantitative Proteomics, and Inferred Metalloproteomes</strong></a></h4><p>Qiong Zhang*, Jiayou Ge, Fengjie Liu, Shabaz Mohammed, Kedong Yin, and Rosalind E. M. Rickaby</p><p>Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 50, 27367–27377</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233</a></p><h6>licensed under <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><strong>CC-BY 4.0</strong></a></h6></blockquote><p><strong>Selected sections from the article follow. Formats and hyperlinks were adapted from the original.</strong></p><p>Many important biological processes of phytoplankton, including photosynthesis, carbon fixation, and nitrogen reduction, rely on enzymes that have metals as cofactors. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(1)</a> It has been estimated that half of all enzymes must be associated with a particular metal to function. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(2)</a> The availability of metals in the environment has changed over geological time and, given imperfections in the selectivity of metal transport systems, proteins have evolved to make the best use of metals that are more available. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(3−5)</a> Depending on their evolutionary histories, different groups of marine phytoplankton may have differences in their metalloprotein compositions and metal transport strategies. The evolving trace metal availability in the environment, thus, may provide a selective pressure to promote the proliferation of different phytoplankton groups in the oceanic environment, affecting the phytoplankton community structure with knock-on effects on the marine food web and carbon sequestration. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(5)</a> It is crucial to understand the utilization of trace metals by different groups of marine phytoplankton that inhabit contrasting niches in the modern ocean, not only by assessing the accumulation of trace metals in cells but also examining the functions of trace metals in different biological pathways.</p><p>In previous studies, the utilization or requirements of trace metals by marine phytoplankton were mostly determined by measuring the elemental stoichiometry in cells (metallome or quota of trace metals). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(6−8)</a> In the field, attempts have also been made to investigate the elements in phytoplankton <a href="javascript:void(0);">(9,10)</a> which have then been compared with profiles in the abiotic environment to understand their relationships. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(11)</a> The discovery of various metal storage proteins and the plasticity in elemental quotas under different environmental conditions raise the question of whether intracellular trace metal quotas reflect true differences in trace metal usage by phytoplankton. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(12,13)</a> In the past few decades, more and more studies have focused on metal–protein partnerships, using approaches such as genome-wide analysis to identify homologues of known metalloproteins and other deduced metal-binding motifs encoded within sequenced genomes. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(5,14)</a> However, this approach has limitations in estimating metal abundance in cells because not all genes predicted in the genome would be translated and expressed as proteins under all environments, and a single gene for a metalloprotein could be highly expressed, such that a translation from genetic presence to a required concentration is not linear and could be environment-dependent. To obtain <i>in situ</i> metal abundance in metalloproteins in cells, native separation of proteins by HPLC or PAGE followed by the detection of metals using ICP-MS <a href="javascript:void(0);">(15,16)</a> has been used. This approach also has limitations in that, without bioinformatics, it cannot identify the function of proteins within which the metals are found, and it may also depend on the composition of the media to which the organism has been exposed and in which it has been growing. An ideal way to solve the problem would be to separate and purify each of the proteins and then identify both the associated metal (<i>e.g.,</i> by ICP-MS) and the protein sequence (<i>e.g.,</i> by mass spectrometry). However, this approach is constrained by the resolution of chromatographic or electrophoretic techniques, making it challenging to establish the metal–protein associations unambiguously; many proteins often co-occur in metal-containing fractions. Additionally, this method requires huge volumes of biomass and is both time-consuming and complex, complicating the reconstruction of the expressed metalloproteome in cells. The techniques and challenges for metalloproteomics have been discussed in detail in previously published review articles (and the references therein). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(17)</a></p><p>In this study, we determined the trace metal utilization (the metallome) of different phytoplankton from their expressed proteome via a protein modeling and homologue identification approach, and then compared the resulting metallome with the metal quota data measured by the traditional inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). This approach allows the building of a link between the truly used trace elements and their biological functions in phytoplankton. We aim to fill the gap between an estimation of metals encoded in the genome and metal analysis by ICP-MS in phytoplankton, which may be more broadly applicable to infer cellular metallomes.</p><h3><strong>Materials and Methods</strong></h3><h4><strong>ICP-MS Analysis</strong></h4><p>All preparation of samples for ICP-MS measurement was undertaken using trace metal clean methods. All plasticware used in this study, including culture flasks, pipette tips, and centrifuge tubes, was precleaned in 10% quartz-distilled HCl and thoroughly rinsed with 18 MΩ cm water in a clean laboratory. Trace elements in the filtered lysates of <i>G. huxleyi</i> (OA1, OA4, OA8, OA15, OA16, OA23, and RCC 1242) and <i>Synechocystis</i> (FACHB898) strains were measured using an ICP-MS. The detailed ICP-MS method and instrumental settings are described in Zhang et al. (2018). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(31)</a></p><h4><strong>Protein Mass Spectrometry</strong></h4><p>The peptides were resuspended in 5% formic acid and 5% DMSO prior to mass spectrometry. They were separated on an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=3&amp;search=Ultimate+3000+UHPLC"><strong>Ultimate 3000 UHPLC </strong></a>system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and electrosprayed directly into a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/559"><strong>Q-Exactive Mass Spectrometer</strong></a> (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through an EASY-Spray nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were trapped on a C18 PepMap100 precolumn (300 μm i.d. × 5 mm, 100 Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water) at a pressure of 500 bar. The peptides were separated on an in-house packed analytical column (75 μm i.d. × 50 cm packed with ReproSil-Pur 120 C18-AQ, 1.9 μm, 120 Å, Dr. Maisch GmbH) using a linear gradient (length: 65 min, 15% to 35% solvent B [0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile], flow rate: 200 nL/min). The raw data were acquired on the mass spectrometer in a data-dependent mode (DDA). Full scan MS spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap (scan range 350–1500 <i>m</i>/<i>z</i>, resolution 70000, AGC target 3e6, maximum injection time 50 ms). After the MS scans, the 10 most intense peaks were selected for HCD fragmentation at 30% of normalized collision energy. HCD spectra were also acquired in the Orbitrap (resolution 17500, AGC target 5e4, maximum injection time 120 ms, isolation window 1.5 <i>m</i>/<i>z</i>) with the first fixed mass at 180 <i>m</i>/<i>z</i>. Charge exclusion was selected for unassigned and 1+ ions. The dynamic exclusion was set to 20 s.</p><h3><strong>Results and Discussion</strong></h3><h4><strong>Trace Elements Determined from the Expressed Proteomes of Different Phytoplankton</strong></h4><p>Based on the expressed proteome sequences, we predicted metal-binding proteins and compared their distribution among various phytoplankton species (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig2">Figure 2</a>). The inference revealed 28 different metals in <i>G. huxleyi</i>, 31 different metals in <i>C. reinhardtii</i>, and 30 different metals in <i>Synechocystis</i>. Although only 6 different metals were identified in <i>O. tauri</i> proteins, it has to be noted that the analysis for <i>O. tauri</i> was only based on the 40 most abundant proteins reported in this organism <a href="javascript:void(0);">(21)</a> and, hence, the listed elements, including Mg, Fe, Mn, Ca, Zn, and Cu, may represent the most essential metals for the species.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Environ_Sci_Technol_2025_59_50_27367_27377_Figure_2_The_number_of_metal_binding_proteins_identified_in_the_expressed_proteome_of_the_haptophyte_G_9b8ac0f004.jpeg" alt="Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 50, 27367–27377: Figure 2. The number of metal-binding proteins identified in the expressed proteome of the haptophyte G. huxleyi (a), the chlorophyte C. reinhardtii (b) and O. tauri(c), and the cyanobacteria Synechocystis (d). Pie charts show the percentages of metalloproteins containing specific metals. Original proteome data for G. huxleyi are from Mckew et al. (2013) (24) for C. reinhardtii are from Hsieh et al. (2013) (77) for O.tauriare from Martin et al. (2012) (21) for Synechocystisare from Chen et al. (2018). (22) *Noted that for O. tauri, only the 40 most abundant proteins were included in this analysis. ND: no metal binding was found in the proteins." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Environ_Sci_Technol_2025_59_50_27367_27377_Figure_2_The_number_of_metal_binding_proteins_identified_in_the_expressed_proteome_of_the_haptophyte_G_9b8ac0f004.jpeg 123w," sizes="100vw" width="934" height="1181"></p><p>The number of proteins that bind with different metals varies dramatically in phytoplankton. For metalloproteins, there are variations in the binding affinities of different metals to organic molecules. For example, the affinities of divalent metals to proteins have a tendency to follow a universal order of preference, namely the Irving-Williams series (Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> [weakest binding] &lt; Mn<sup>2+</sup> &lt; Fe<sup>2+</sup> &lt; Co<sup>2+</sup> &lt; Ni<sup>2+</sup> &lt; Cu<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Zn<sup>2+</sup>). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(43)</a> Cells can simultaneously contain proteins having high-affinity-binding metals, such as Cu and Zn, and others that require uncompetitive metals, such as Mg and Ca. One of the least competitive metals for binding with biological chelators, Mg, is even found to be the most widely distributed metal in the metalloproteomes of various phytoplankton species in this study, supporting the observations of high concentrations in the protein fraction of cells (at millimolar concentrations <a href="javascript:void(0);">(31)</a>).</p><p>In all phytoplankton species in our analysis, the Mg-containing proteins are found to have the highest proportion in all metalloproteins identified. About 30% of the metalloproteins in different strains of phytoplankton are found to contain Mg or depend on it for function (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig2">Figure 2</a>), suggesting the important role of Mg in phytoplankton cells. It is generally coordinated in protein complexes by ATP or ADP and has also been found to be largely distributed in the chloroplasts or thylakoids in <i>G. huxleyi</i> and <i>Synechocystis</i>. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(22,24)</a> The essential roles of Mg in plants have been reported in various studies. Mg<sup>2+</sup> is known to be the central atom of the chlorophyll molecule, and its levels in the chloroplast regulate the activity of key photosynthetic enzymes. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(44)</a> It was reported that approximately 15–35% of total Mg is in the chloroplasts of a plant, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(45)</a> and it also serves as an osmotically active ion in the regulation of cells <a href="javascript:void(0);">(46)</a></p><h4><strong>Comparison Between Metallome Measured Directly and Reconstructed from Proteins</strong></h4><p>A large proportion of metals, such as Fe, Mn, and Cu, are found in membrane proteins,and may contribute significantly to total cellular quotas. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(54,55)</a> However, for method development purpose, we endeavored to remove the cell membranes from our samples to focus mostly on the analysis of intracellular metal quotas and metalloproteins in the cytosol fraction in this study. We note that our analysis includes some membrane-bound proteins likely derived from organelles or surface membranes disrupted during sonication.</p><p>The derivation of cellular metal composition, as determined by two different methods, is compared in <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig3">Figure 3</a>. The abundance of metal in the proteins is determined as the relative abundance of the protein multiplied by the number of metal ions needed for the specific protein. The abundance of the proteins was normalized to ensure that the total intensities from each replicate measurement for the same species were similar. Since the proteomic data used here were generated from different studies using different instruments, we cannot quantify or compare the absolute biomass of proteins used for each species. Therefore, we cannot compare the absolute trace metal abundance between species solely from metal inferences of expressed proteomes. Nevertheless, we can estimate the relative abundance of different metals in the same species. For the elements that are both measured by the ICP-MS and identified in the proteome, there are generally good correlations (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.81 in <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig3">Figure 3</a>a and <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.74 in <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig3">Figure 3</a>b) between the two approaches. This indicates that the metal compositions determined from the protein modeling may be reliable and, therefore, can reflect the metal usage in different phytoplankton. This would provide a level of assurance to further investigate the metal binding associated with various proteins, thereby deepening our understanding of the roles that different metals play in phytoplankton.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Environ_Sci_Technol_2025_59_50_27367_27377_Figure_3_Relationship_between_the_abundance_of_metals_determined_by_ICP_MS_analysis_e7b259e376.jpeg" alt="Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 50, 27367–27377: Figure 3. Relationship between the abundance of metals determined by ICP-MS analysis (normalized to C, mmol/mol C) and metal abundance determined from the metalloproteome analysis (the unit is arbitrary). To account for strain variations, the ICP-MS data for the cellular metal content of G. huxleyi are average values from 7 G. huxleyi strains isolated from different areas of the ocean, and the proteome-derived metal composition data are average values calculated from 2 of those G. huxleyi strains (OA1 and OA16) isolated previously, and data from Mckew et al., 2013. (24) The ICP-MS data for Synechocystis are from Synechocystis sp. FACHB898 measured in this study, and the proteome data are calculated from Chen et al., 2018. (22) Noted that the abundance of metals from each proteome was calculated by using the metal stoichiometry multiplied by the relative abundance of proteins, which provides only a relative relationship of different trace metals, not absolute abundance. The symbols represent the mean values, and the error bars indicate standard deviations." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Environ_Sci_Technol_2025_59_50_27367_27377_Figure_3_Relationship_between_the_abundance_of_metals_determined_by_ICP_MS_analysis_e7b259e376.jpeg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1384" height="641"></p><p>Compared to the other metals investigated in this study, Ca and Mg appear to have a much higher relative abundance in the ICP-MS analysis than in the proteomic analysis of <i>G. huxleyi</i> and <i>Synechocystis</i> (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig3">Figure 3</a>). These two elements are essential macronutrients for phytoplankton and plants. Ca is the most prominent secondary messenger that plays a crucial role in response to extracellular stimuli in all eukaryotes. Ca<sup>2+</sup> fluxes are transported via Ca channels and transporters, such as Ca-ATPase, regulating a series of important biological functions, including mineral uptake and utilization, K<sup>+</sup> homeostasis adjustment, and regulatory network activity in response to P or N deficiency. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(56)</a> Ca is not always incorporated into protein structures. The Ca abundance determined from the proteins in this study, therefore, is much lower than the actual Ca needed intracellularly. Similarly, the intracellular Mg<sup>2+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> abundances should also be higher than those determined from the protein structures. Free Mg<sup>2+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> are known to regulate cation–anion balance and serve as osmotically active ions in the regulation of cells <a href="javascript:void(0);">(46)</a> but free metal ion concentrations cannot be determined through the approach used in this study. Thus, it is not surprising to see much higher relative abundances of Ca and Mg in ICP-MS analysis than in proteomic analysis (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c11233#fig3">Figure 3</a>).</p>

Unlocking Phytoplankton Metallomes with Comparative Analysis of Metal Quotas, Quantitative Proteomics, and Inferred Metalloproteomes

Article

Webinars

Scientific article

Science and research

The Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute (CATRIN) at Palacký University is a cutting-edge scientific hub dedicated to advancing research in the fields of nanotechnology, biotechnology, and biomedicine. At its core, CATRIN boasts outstanding scientific teams, featuring international researchers. We emphasize interdisciplinarity, foster global collaborations, and work to translate our research findings into practical applications.

CATRIN

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

LECO LM Series Microindentation Hardness Testing Systems

The LECO LM Series offers flexible microindentation hardness testing from 1 gf to 2000 gf, with compact designs, multiple turret options, and analog or digital models for labs and production sites.

<p><strong>The LECO LM Series Microindentation Hardness Testing Systems are designed to meet the needs of both production environments and research laboratories. With a broad range of configurations—from economical analog models to advanced digital systems—the LM Series offers flexible solutions that can be tailored to your application requirements and budget.</strong></p><p>These systems support precise microindentation testing across a wide load range and are suitable for detailed hardness evaluation of thin layers, coatings, and small or delicate specimens. Their compact footprint, flexible turret configurations, and wide selection of objectives make the LM Series a versatile and reliable choice for modern hardness testing workflows.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/LECO_LM_Stanoveni_mikrotvrdosti_12e8c38050.jpg" alt="LECO: LM Series Microindentation Hardness Testing Systems" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_LECO_LM_Stanoveni_mikrotvrdosti_12e8c38050.jpg 235w," sizes="100vw" width="416" height="276"></p><h4><strong>Key Features</strong></h4><ul><li>Load range from <strong>1 gf to 2000 gf</strong> for broad application coverage</li><li>Manual or automatic turret options</li><li>Wide selection of objectives from <strong>2.5X to 100X</strong></li><li>Turret configuration supporting up to <strong>four objectives and two indenters</strong></li><li>Compact design to save valuable laboratory space</li></ul><h4><strong>Applications</strong></h4><ul><li>Coating and surface layer hardness testing (e.g., nitrided layers)</li><li>Hardness profiling across material layers</li><li>Thin specimen analysis</li><li>Weld and heat-affected zone evaluation</li></ul><h4><strong>Available Models</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>LM110 Series</strong> – Economical solution for low-volume laboratories</li><li><strong>LM310 Series</strong> – Digital measurement with automatic hardness calculations</li><li><strong>LM810 Series</strong> – Digital measurement, hardness calculations, conversions, and statistical analysis</li><li><strong>LM248AT Dual Indenter</strong> – Digital measurements with conversions and statistical hardness data using dual indenters</li></ul>

LECO LCB3100 Brinell Load Cell Hardness Tester

LCB3100 is a Brinell load cell hardness tester with touch-pad control, automatic load application, and selectable loads, delivering accurate, repeatable hardness testing without mechanical weights.

<p><strong>The LECO LCB3100 is a modern Brinell hardness tester that uses advanced load cell technology to deliver accurate, repeatable, and user-friendly hardness measurements. Designed to simplify operation and reduce the risk of operator error, the LCB3100 eliminates traditional mechanical weights and adjustment knobs in favor of an intuitive electronic control system.</strong></p><p>Hardness testing is performed through a simple touch-pad operation panel, where the user selects the desired test load and dwell time. The instrument then automatically applies, holds, and removes the load using direct load-cell feedback, ensuring precise force control and consistent results. Its rugged construction and enclosed load cell make the LCB3100 well suited for routine laboratory use as well as demanding industrial environments.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/LECO_LCB_3100_Tvrdomer_Brinell_se_snimacem_zatizeni_9cb81e86c5.jpg" alt="LECO: LCB3100 Brinell Load Cell Hardness Tester" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_LECO_LCB_3100_Tvrdomer_Brinell_se_snimacem_zatizeni_9cb81e86c5.jpg 196w," sizes="100vw" width="1723" height="1371"></p><h4><strong>Key Features</strong></h4><ul><li>Twelve selectable Brinell load options for flexible testing</li><li>Direct load method with real-time load-cell feedback</li><li>Automatic load application, holding, and removal</li><li>Selectable dwell times to meet different testing standards</li><li>Heavy-duty cast housing with enclosed load cell for long-term stability</li><li>User-friendly touch-pad operation panel that simplifies setup and minimizes errors</li></ul>

LECO AMH55 Software for Automated Hardness Testing

AMH55 software enables automated, semi-automated, and manual hardness testing with advanced image recognition, flexible reporting, and Cornerstone® control for accurate microindentation and Vickers analysis.

<p><strong>LECO’s AMH55 software is designed to maximize productivity and measurement confidence in microindentation and Macro/Vickers hardness testing. By introducing LECO’s Cornerstone® software platform to hardness testing systems, AMH55 delivers advanced automation, intuitive operation, and flexible reporting for a wide range of applications and surface conditions.</strong></p><p>AMH55 supports fully automatic, semi-automatic, and lite configurations, enabling laboratories to tailor their hardness testing workflow to specific needs while maintaining high accuracy and repeatability. Advanced image-recognition technology ensures reliable evaluation even on challenging sample surfaces, making AMH55 a powerful solution for modern hardness testing environments.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/LECO_AMH_55_Software_pro_automaticke_testovani_tvrdosti_2_9317816b67.jpg" alt="LECO: AMH55 Software for Automated Hardness Testing" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_LECO_AMH_55_Software_pro_automaticke_testovani_tvrdosti_2_9317816b67.jpg 172w," sizes="100vw" width="838" height="761"></p><h4><strong>Key Features</strong></h4><ul><li>Advanced image-recognition technology for analysis beyond simple threshold-based methods</li><li>Reliable measurement on scratched, etched, uneven, or variably illuminated surfaces</li><li>Cornerstone® software with optional touch-screen interface for full control of methods, calibrations, analysis parameters, and reporting</li><li>Flexible configurations to support automatic, semi-automatic, or manual workflows</li><li>Customizable data reporting to match laboratory and application requirements</li></ul><h4><strong>Configuration Options</strong></h4><h5><strong>AMH55 Automatic</strong></h5><ul><li>Fully automatic alignment and parfocal tools</li><li>Automatic pixel calibration and shading correction</li><li>Optional Advanced Analysis Module for color-contoured hardness mapping</li><li>Fully customizable reporting</li><li>Motorized X, Y, and Z axis movement</li></ul><h5><strong>AMH55 Semi-Automatic</strong></h5><ul><li>Automatic indent location and analysis</li><li>Automatic alignment and pixel calibration</li><li>Customizable reporting</li><li>Motorized X and Y axes</li><li>Manual focus</li></ul><h5><strong>AMH55 Lite</strong></h5><ul><li>Automatic indent detection and analysis within a single field of view</li><li>Automatic pixel calibration</li><li>Customizable reporting</li><li>Manual X, Y, and Z axes</li><li>Optional digital stage micrometers for position tracking</li><li>Upgradeable to AMH55 Semi-Automatic or Automatic</li></ul><h4><strong>Compatible Models</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>AMH55 with LM110 Series</strong> microindentation systems</li><li><strong>AMH55 with LM248 Series</strong> microindentation systems</li><li><strong>AMH55 with LV110/LV810 Series</strong> Macro Vickers hardness testers</li></ul>

LECO LR/LCR Series Rockwell-Type Hardness Testing System

LECO LR/LCR Series Rockwell hardness testers deliver accurate, repeatable results for high-volume labs, offering Rockwell, Superficial, and automated load-cell testing options.

<p><strong>The LECO LR/LCR Series Rockwell-type hardness testing systems are designed for high-throughput laboratories that require reliable, repeatable, and efficient hardness measurements. Built for routine industrial and quality control environments, these instruments combine robust mechanical design with intuitive operation to ensure consistent results, even under heavy workloads.</strong></p><p>With a range of configurations available—including analog, digital, and fully automated load-cell-based systems—the LR/LCR Series can be precisely matched to your testing requirements. Whether performing standard Rockwell, Superficial Rockwell, or advanced automated testing, these systems deliver confidence, ease of use, and long-term stability.</p><h4><strong>Key Features</strong></h4><ul><li>User-friendly operation panel for simple and efficient testing</li><li>Clear OK/NG indicators for rapid pass/fail evaluation</li><li>Automatic measuring mode to improve repeatability and reduce operator influence</li><li>Integrated hardness conversion scales displayed directly on the operation panel</li><li>Free loads and optional light-load Brinell testing available on the LCR500 model</li></ul><h4><strong>Available Models</strong></h4><h5><strong>LR110 Series</strong></h5><ul><li>Rockwell-only or Superficial-only testing</li></ul><h5><strong>LR310 Series</strong></h5><ul><li>Supports both Rockwell and Superficial Rockwell testing</li></ul><h5><strong>LCR500</strong></h5><ul><li>Fully automated load-cell Rockwell-type hardness tester</li><li>Supports free loads and optional light-load Brinell testing</li></ul><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/LECO_LR_LCR_Tvrdomery_Rockwell_3_aaf47a1ae5.jpg" alt="LECO: LR/LCR Series Rockwell-Type Hardness Testing System" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_LECO_LR_LCR_Tvrdomery_Rockwell_3_aaf47a1ae5.jpg 231w," sizes="100vw" width="1613" height="1091"></p>

LECO LV Series Macro-Vickers Hardness Testing System

LECO LV Series Macro-Vickers hardness testers provide affordable, flexible hardness testing for large samples, offering wide load ranges, multiple objectives, and upgrade options for demanding applications.

<p><strong>The LECO LV Series Macro-Vickers hardness testing systems provide an affordable and versatile solution for hardness testing of larger and heavier samples commonly encountered in welding, metallurgical, and industrial applications. Designed for reliability and flexibility, the LV Series supports both routine and more demanding hardness measurements across a wide load range.</strong></p><p>Available in analog and digital configurations, the LV Series can be tailored to laboratory needs, with upgrade paths toward more automated operation. This modular approach allows laboratories to start with a basic configuration and expand capabilities as testing requirements evolve.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/LECO_LV_Stanoveni_makrotvrdosti_2_c6b6bb0ddb.jpg" alt="LECO: LV Series Macro-Vickers Hardness Testing System" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_LECO_LV_Stanoveni_makrotvrdosti_2_c6b6bb0ddb.jpg 220w," sizes="100vw" width="1795" height="1269"></p><h4><strong>Key Features</strong></h4><ul><li>Turret accommodating up to three objectives for flexible inspection and measurement</li><li>Improved, finer-pitched focusing mechanism compared to previous generations</li><li>Wide load range with eight load steps from 0.3 kgf up to 50 kgf</li><li>Broad selection of objectives ranging from 2.5× to 100×</li><li>Optional light-load Brinell testing on the LV810 (custom load set required)</li></ul><h4><strong>Available Models</strong></h4><h5><strong>LV110 Series</strong></h5><ul><li>Economical solution for low-volume laboratories</li><li>Supports a combination of micro and macro loads</li></ul><h5><strong>LV810 Series</strong></h5><ul><li>Supports a combination of micro and macro loads</li><li>Optional light-load Brinell testing capability</li></ul>

Products focused on Mechanical testing from LECO distributed by LECO Instrumente Plzeň - page 1

Related content

Unlocking Phytoplankton Metallomes with Comparative Analysis of Metal Quotas, Quantitative Proteomics, and Inferred Metalloproteomes

Webinars LabRulezICPMS Week 08/2026

Current sensors are not good enough. Scientists propose a new way to monitor plant health