Fast, accurate, and robust analysis of environmental samples according to US EPA Method 6010D
Applications | 2021 | Thermo Fisher ScientificInstrumentation
Environmental monitoring demands reliable, sensitive, and high-throughput methods to quantify metals and metalloids in water, soil, sludge and waste. US EPA Method 6010D (SW-846) sets a global benchmark for inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) in regulatory and industrial laboratories. Validating instrument performance against this method ensures compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and provides confidence in data quality for environmental compliance, remediation and research.
This study assesses the analytical capabilities of the Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO XP ICP-OES Duo system, integrated with a Teledyne CETAC ASX 560 autosampler and ASXpress PLUS rapid sample introduction valve, for routine analysis under EPA 6010D. Water and soil samples were digested by two approaches: classical hot plate procedures (EPA 3010A/3050B) and microwave assisted acid digestion (EPA 3015A/3051A). Method accuracy, sensitivity, robustness and throughput were evaluated using spiked samples and NIST standard reference materials.
Water and soil matrices were processed following the prescribed acid combinations: nitric and hydrochloric acids for water, and nitric, hydrogen peroxide plus hydrochloric for soils. Twenty water and twelve soil samples from a commercial laboratory were compared to two NIST SRMs (2781 Domestic Sludge and 2709a San Joaquin Soil) processed by microwave digestion. Standards, blanks and QC checks (ICB, ICV, CCB, CCV) were prepared in 2 % HNO₃ with an online-introduced yttrium internal standard. Spectral interferences were monitored and corrected by single-element and mixed SIC solutions.
Calibration curves for all elements exhibited excellent linearity (R² > 0.9997) over five concentration points. Instrument detection limits were in the low ppb range, with several elements in the sub-ppb domain, surpassing EPA requirements. Blank checks remained below 0.5 × LLOQ, and verification standards (ICV/CCV) stayed within ±10 % across runs. Spectral-interference checks returned recoveries between 90 % and 113 %. Matrix spike and duplicate recoveries for water and soil fell within ±25 %, confirming minimal matrix bias. SRM recoveries for certified elements were within ±10 %, demonstrating method accuracy. Microwave digestion consistently yielded higher recoveries than hot plate digestion, indicating more complete sample decomposition. Over 15 hours (> 500 samples), QC recoveries and internal standard stability remained within acceptance criteria, reflecting excellent robustness.
The iCAP PRO XP Duo configuration delivers rapid per-sample analysis (1 min 28 s) while maintaining high sensitivity and a wide dynamic range by combining axial and radial views. Automated spectral-interference correction and integrated QC protocols simplify method implementation and ensure data integrity. High throughput and low carryover make this approach ideal for contract laboratories, regulatory compliance testing and industrial quality assurance.
Regulatory acceptance of microwave digestion as equivalent to hot plate protocols under the 2021 EPA Methods Update Rule will accelerate adoption of high-pressure, high-temperature sample preparation. Integration with laboratory information management systems and advanced data analytics, including AI-driven spectral deconvolution, will further streamline workflows. Expanding ICP-OES applications to emergent contaminants and coupling with hyphenated techniques may open new frontiers in environmental analysis.
The Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO XP ICP-OES Duo system, paired with rapid sample introduction, meets and exceeds the performance criteria of EPA Method 6010D. It offers fast, accurate, and robust multi-element analysis across diverse environmental matrices, supporting regulatory compliance and high-volume laboratory operations.
ICP-OES
IndustriesEnvironmental
ManufacturerThermo Fisher Scientific, Teledyne LABS
Summary
Significance of the Topic
Environmental monitoring demands reliable, sensitive, and high-throughput methods to quantify metals and metalloids in water, soil, sludge and waste. US EPA Method 6010D (SW-846) sets a global benchmark for inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) in regulatory and industrial laboratories. Validating instrument performance against this method ensures compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and provides confidence in data quality for environmental compliance, remediation and research.
Objectives and Study Overview
This study assesses the analytical capabilities of the Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO XP ICP-OES Duo system, integrated with a Teledyne CETAC ASX 560 autosampler and ASXpress PLUS rapid sample introduction valve, for routine analysis under EPA 6010D. Water and soil samples were digested by two approaches: classical hot plate procedures (EPA 3010A/3050B) and microwave assisted acid digestion (EPA 3015A/3051A). Method accuracy, sensitivity, robustness and throughput were evaluated using spiked samples and NIST standard reference materials.
Applied Methodology and Instrumentation
Water and soil matrices were processed following the prescribed acid combinations: nitric and hydrochloric acids for water, and nitric, hydrogen peroxide plus hydrochloric for soils. Twenty water and twelve soil samples from a commercial laboratory were compared to two NIST SRMs (2781 Domestic Sludge and 2709a San Joaquin Soil) processed by microwave digestion. Standards, blanks and QC checks (ICB, ICV, CCB, CCV) were prepared in 2 % HNO₃ with an online-introduced yttrium internal standard. Spectral interferences were monitored and corrected by single-element and mixed SIC solutions.
Used Instrumentation
- Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO XP ICP-OES Duo system with axial/radial dual optics
- Teledyne CETAC ASX 560 autosampler and ASXpress PLUS rapid introduction valve
- ETHOS EZ SK10 Milestone microwave digestion system
Main Results and Discussion
Calibration curves for all elements exhibited excellent linearity (R² > 0.9997) over five concentration points. Instrument detection limits were in the low ppb range, with several elements in the sub-ppb domain, surpassing EPA requirements. Blank checks remained below 0.5 × LLOQ, and verification standards (ICV/CCV) stayed within ±10 % across runs. Spectral-interference checks returned recoveries between 90 % and 113 %. Matrix spike and duplicate recoveries for water and soil fell within ±25 %, confirming minimal matrix bias. SRM recoveries for certified elements were within ±10 %, demonstrating method accuracy. Microwave digestion consistently yielded higher recoveries than hot plate digestion, indicating more complete sample decomposition. Over 15 hours (> 500 samples), QC recoveries and internal standard stability remained within acceptance criteria, reflecting excellent robustness.
Benefits and Practical Applications of the Method
The iCAP PRO XP Duo configuration delivers rapid per-sample analysis (1 min 28 s) while maintaining high sensitivity and a wide dynamic range by combining axial and radial views. Automated spectral-interference correction and integrated QC protocols simplify method implementation and ensure data integrity. High throughput and low carryover make this approach ideal for contract laboratories, regulatory compliance testing and industrial quality assurance.
Future Trends and Potential Applications
Regulatory acceptance of microwave digestion as equivalent to hot plate protocols under the 2021 EPA Methods Update Rule will accelerate adoption of high-pressure, high-temperature sample preparation. Integration with laboratory information management systems and advanced data analytics, including AI-driven spectral deconvolution, will further streamline workflows. Expanding ICP-OES applications to emergent contaminants and coupling with hyphenated techniques may open new frontiers in environmental analysis.
Conclusion
The Thermo Scientific iCAP PRO XP ICP-OES Duo system, paired with rapid sample introduction, meets and exceeds the performance criteria of EPA Method 6010D. It offers fast, accurate, and robust multi-element analysis across diverse environmental matrices, supporting regulatory compliance and high-volume laboratory operations.
References
- US EPA (2018) Method 6010D (SW-846 Update VI): Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry, Revision 6.
- US EPA (n.d.) Method 3010A: Acid Digestion of Aqueous Samples and Extracts for Total Metals Analysis by FLAAS or ICP Spectroscopy.
- US EPA (n.d.) Method 3050B: Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils, Revision B.
- US EPA (2007) Method 3015A: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Aqueous Samples and Extracts, Revision 1.
- US EPA (2007) Method 3051A: Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, Soils, and Oils, Revision 1.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
NEMC: Overcoming interferences in challenging sample matrices using ICP-OES
2022|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Posters
Overcoming interferences in challenging sample matrices using ICP-OES Weimin Yang1, Jianfeng Cui2, Sabrina Antonio1, Matthew Cassap3 1: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bannockburn, USA; 2: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany; 3: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom. ABSTRACT Inter Element Correction…
Key words
axial, axialradial, radialiec, iecoes, oeselement, elementcorrection, correctionicp, icpwavelength, wavelengthqtegra, qtegrainterferences, interferencesinterference, interferenceinterfered, interferedisds, isdsicap, icapelements
Analysis of Waste Samples According to US EPA Method 6010D
2020|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Environmental Analysis of Waste Samples According to US EPA Method 6010D Using the smart features of the Agilent 5800 VDV ICP-OES to simplify method development and quality assure the results Authors Introduction Peter Riles Agilent Technologies, Inc. In…
Key words
lloq, lloqintelliquant, intelliquanticv, icvmaintenance, maintenanceconfidentiality, confidentialityicsa, icsarecovery, recoveryocf, ocficb, icbscreening, screeningccb, ccbcorrection, correctionspike, spikebackground, backgroundicp
Automating the Workflow for the Analysis of Soils by ICP-OES
2024|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Environmental Automating the Workflow for the Analysis of Soils by ICP-OES Productive analysis of high matrix samples using the Agilent 5800 ICP-OES with Advanced Dilution System Author Introduction Daniel McCarthy To manage the large sample loads that are…
Key words
autodilution, autodilutiondilution, dilutionsample, sampleicp, icpoes, oesprescriptive, prescriptiveelement, elementdilutions, dilutionssrms, srmsresult, resultmeasured, measureduptake, uptakestock, stockcalibration, calibrationsamples
Rapid, interference-free analysis of water according to US EPA Method 200.7
2021|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
APPLICATION NOTE 000056 Rapid, interference-free analysis of water according to US EPA Method 200.7 Authors: Bhagyesh Surekar1, Cristian Cojocariu2, Matthew Cassap2, and Sabrina Antonio3 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK 3 Thermo Fisher Scientific, US…
Key words
axial, axialiec, iecradial, radialsic, sicanalytes, analytesrecovery, recoveryipc, ipcicap, icapoes, oesaccuracy, accuracyicp, icpduo, duocorrection, correctioninterferents, interferentssolution