WCPS: New Standardized Methods for Metals in Cannabis
Posters | 2023 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
Cannabis products are increasingly consumed for medical and recreational use. Ensuring they meet safety criteria for toxic metal content is critical to protect public health and comply with regulatory requirements.
This work presents the validation of new ICP-MS methods adopted by AOAC and ASTM for quantifying arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead in diverse cannabis and hemp matrices. The aim was to establish robust, consensus-driven protocols with official status.
Sample digestion employed microwave-assisted acid treatment using HNO3 and HCl in TFM vessels. Calibration standards were prepared in dilute acid. The following instrumentation was used:
Calibration for As, Cd, Hg and Pb showed excellent linearity, with LOQs ≤10 ppb. Recovery studies on four NIST SRMs and spiking tests across low, medium and high levels met AOAC SMPR criteria (60–115% for low spikes, 80–115% for medium/high). IntelliQuant screening revealed occasional rare earth element interferences, highlighting the value of semi-quantitative profiling.
The standardized methods enable laboratories to generate reliable, reproducible data across a wide range of cannabis-based products, supporting regulatory compliance and quality control. Integration of UHMI and CRC technologies minimizes matrix and spectral interferences.
Further development may focus on expanding target analytes, high-throughput workflows, automated interference correction and incorporating isotopic or speciation analyses. Collaborative efforts could lead to additional official methods for other contaminants in cannabis.
The adoption of AOAC and ASTM ICP-MS protocols for metal analysis in cannabis provides laboratories with validated, consensus methods, ensuring accurate assessment of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in complex matrices.
ICP/MS
IndustriesFood & Agriculture
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies
Summary
Significance of the Topic
Cannabis products are increasingly consumed for medical and recreational use. Ensuring they meet safety criteria for toxic metal content is critical to protect public health and comply with regulatory requirements.
Goals and Overview of the Study
This work presents the validation of new ICP-MS methods adopted by AOAC and ASTM for quantifying arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead in diverse cannabis and hemp matrices. The aim was to establish robust, consensus-driven protocols with official status.
Methodology and Instrumentation
Sample digestion employed microwave-assisted acid treatment using HNO3 and HCl in TFM vessels. Calibration standards were prepared in dilute acid. The following instrumentation was used:
- Agilent 7850 ICP-MS equipped with UHMI system and ORS4 collision/reaction cell
- Agilent SPS 4 autosampler
- Micro Mist glass concentric nebulizer and quartz spray chamber
- Quartz torch with 2.5 mm injector and nickel-plated cones
- MARS 6 microwave digestion system (CEM)
Main Results and Discussion
Calibration for As, Cd, Hg and Pb showed excellent linearity, with LOQs ≤10 ppb. Recovery studies on four NIST SRMs and spiking tests across low, medium and high levels met AOAC SMPR criteria (60–115% for low spikes, 80–115% for medium/high). IntelliQuant screening revealed occasional rare earth element interferences, highlighting the value of semi-quantitative profiling.
Benefits and Practical Applications
The standardized methods enable laboratories to generate reliable, reproducible data across a wide range of cannabis-based products, supporting regulatory compliance and quality control. Integration of UHMI and CRC technologies minimizes matrix and spectral interferences.
Future Trends and Possibilities
Further development may focus on expanding target analytes, high-throughput workflows, automated interference correction and incorporating isotopic or speciation analyses. Collaborative efforts could lead to additional official methods for other contaminants in cannabis.
Conclusion
The adoption of AOAC and ASTM ICP-MS protocols for metal analysis in cannabis provides laboratories with validated, consensus methods, ensuring accurate assessment of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in complex matrices.
References
- Keren Dopelt, Pnina Radon, Nadav Davidovitch. Environmental Effects of the Livestock Industry: The Relationship between Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior among Students in Israel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):13592.
- Patrick J. Gray, William R. Mindak, John Cheng. US FDA Elemental Analysis Manual 4.7 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometric Determination of Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, and Other Elements in Food Using Microwave Assisted Digestion. Version 1.2, February 2020.
- Jenny Nelson, Elaine Hasty, Leanne Anderson, Macy Harris. Determination of Critical Elements in Foods in Accordance with US FDA EAM 4.7 ICP-MS Method. Agilent Technologies publication 5994-2839EN.
- Octopole Collision/Reaction Cell and Helium Mode. Agilent publication 5994-1172EN.
- Edward O'Neill, Joshua Ansel, Grace Kwong, Michael Plastino, Jenny Nelson, Keith Baar, David Block. Spent media analysis suggests cultivated meat media will require species and cell type optimization. NPJ Sci. Food.
- Ultra High Matrix Introduction. Agilent ICP-MS technology brief 5994-1170EN.
- Enhanced Helium Mode Cell Performance for Improved Interference Removal in ICP-MS. Agilent publication 5990-7573EN.
- William C. Cunningham, William R. Mindak, Stephen G. Capar. US FDA Elemental Analysis Manual for Food and Related Products 3.2 Terminology, 2014.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Determination of Heavy Metals in Cannabis and Hemp Products Following AOAC Method for ICP-MS
2021|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Cannabis & Hemp Testing Determination of Heavy Metals in Cannabis and Hemp Products Following AOAC Method for ICP-MS Routine monitoring of As, Cd, Hg, Pb, and other elements using an Agilent 7850 ICP-MS Authors Jenny Nelson, Craig Jones,…
Key words
cbd, cbdhemp, hempaoac, aoaccannabis, cannabisuhmi, uhmidigestion, digestionsrms, srmsmethod, methodtopical, topicalrecovery, recoveryicp, icpsample, sampleelement, elementconc, concdilution
Agilent ICP-MS Journal (November 2021, Issue 86)
2021|Agilent Technologies|Others
Agilent ICP-MS Journal November 2021, Issue 86 ICP-MS to Support Regulatory Limits and Industry Needs Page 1 ICP-MS to Support Regulatory Limits and Industry Needs Pages 2-3 AOAC Method for the Analysis of Cannabis and Hemp Samples by ICP-MS Page…
Key words
icp, icpsemiconductor, semiconductorhemp, hempcannabis, cannabiscbd, cbdindustry, industryagilent, agilentbert, bertapplications, applicationscmp, cmplens, lensultrafiltration, ultrafiltrationintelliquant, intelliquantparticle, particletrace
Multi-Element Analysis of Cannabis and Hemp using ICP-MS
2020|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Cannabis & Hemp Testing Multi-Element Analysis of Cannabis and Hemp using ICP-MS Agilent 7800 used to analyze 25 elements in a range of cannabis, hemp, and related products Authors Introduction Craig Jones and Jenny Nelson Agilent Technologies, USA…
Key words
pass, passcannabis, cannabisistd, istdhemp, hempsrms, srmsrecovery, recoveryelement, elementspike, spikespi, spielements, elementscertified, certifiedfail, failmean, meanwere, wereicv
Multi-elem ent Analys is of Cannabis us ing the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS
2017|Agilent Technologies|Posters
Multi-elem ent Analys is of Cannabis us ing the Agilent 7800 ICP-MS Introduction Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA Results and Discussion Results and Discussion Countries and U.S. states that permit use of medicinal and recreational marijuana require rigorous…
Key words
ppb, ppbcannabis, cannabismeasured, measuredelement, elementcantabs, cantabsdreamstime, dreamstimeenny, ennynels, nelsmin, minlantanides, lantanidesultiple, ultiplepons, ponsenvironm, environmpiked, pikedples