Water Analysis Using ICP-OES with an Ultrasonic Nebulizer

Importance of the Topic

Water quality monitoring is critical for public health and environmental protection. Trace element concentrations in drinking water often approach analytical detection limits, necessitating sensitive, accurate, and reliable methods. Legislative bodies such as the US EPA and EEC set maximum contaminant levels that require advanced instrumentation capable of direct, low-level determinations without extensive sample preparation.

Objectives and Study Overview

This work evaluates the performance of an ultrasonic nebulizer (model U-5000AT) coupled to a Liberty 200 ICP-OES spectrometer for the direct analysis of trace elements in water. Key goals include comparing detection limits to a conventional pneumatic nebulizer, assessing precision and stability, and validating accuracy using certified US EPA and NIST reference waters as well as domestic drinking water samples.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Sample aerosol is generated by directing the liquid stream onto a piezoelectric transducer at 1.4 MHz to produce droplets below 10 microns. A heated desolvation chamber removes excess solvent before introduction to the plasma. Operating parameters of the Liberty 200 ICP-OES include a 40.68 MHz RF generator at 1.5 kW, plasma gas flow of 12 L/min, auxiliary flow of 0.75 L/min, and sample uptake rates of 1.8 to 5 mL/min. Calibration utilizes multi-element standards acidified to match sample matrix. Reagent blanks and dynamic background correction ensure data quality.

Main Results and Discussion

• Detection limits improved by factors of 5 to 50 relative to a concentric glass nebulizer, with typical USN limits well below regulatory MCLs for elements such as Cd, Pb, Ni, and Mn.
• Emission intensities increased by an order of magnitude, enhancing sensitivity for low-level analytes.
• Memory effects were minimal, with 0.1% signal decay washout times of 33–39 seconds comparable to pneumatic systems.
• Short-term precision ranged from 0.5 to 2 %RSD; long-term stability over 18 hours showed 1.1 to 1.9 %RSD without recalibration.
• Accuracy was confirmed by analysis of US EPA Pollution Control samples and NIST SRM 1643b, with most measured values agreeing within certification uncertainties.
• Matrix effects tested by spiking water with high Ca/Mg levels yielded recoveries above 97%, demonstrating robustness in hard water.
• Analyses of Australian drinking waters reported concentrations below guideline values for both trace and major elements.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The ultrasonic nebulizer-ICP-OES combination enables direct, high-throughput water testing with minimal sample handling. Enhanced sensitivity eliminates or reduces preconcentration steps, lowering contamination risk and labour. The approach meets US EPA and EEC regulatory requirements for drinking water analysis and is adaptable to QA/QC, environmental monitoring, and industrial process control.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advancements may include integration of automated micro-nebulization and desolvation modules, coupling with high-resolution ICP-MS for even lower detection limits, and development of portable or field-deployable systems. Data analytics and AI-driven method optimization could further improve throughput and reliability. Expansion into real-time on-line monitoring and multi-matrix applications presents new opportunities for environmental and industrial analytics.

Conclusion

The ultrasonic nebulizer paired with the Liberty 200 ICP-OES delivers substantial gains in sensitivity, precision, and stability for trace water analysis. It simplifies sample introduction, reduces contamination risk, and fulfills stringent regulatory criteria, establishing a robust platform for routine water quality assessment.

References

1. Thompson M, Ramsey MH, Pahlavanpour B. Analyst. 1982;107:1330.
2. US EPA Method 200.7. Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry for water and wastes. 1985.
3. McLeod CW et al. Analyst. 1981;106:419.
4. Miyazaki A et al. Anal Chim Acta. 1982;144:213.
5. Miyazaki A et al. Anal Sci. 1987;3:185.
6. Sturgeon RE et al. Anal Chem. 1980;52:1585.
7. Thompson M, Pahlavanpour B, Thorne LT. Water Res. 1981;15:407.
8. Hiraide M et al. Anal Chem. 1980;52:804.
9. US EPA Contract Laboratory Program SOW No. 788. 1988.
10. NHMRC/AWRC Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality in Australia. 1987.
11. US EPA Federal Register. 1975;40(141) & 1979;44(140).
12. US EPA Proposed Federal Register. 1990;55(143):30370.
13. Offic J European Communities. L229:11–29. 1980.